The Far- and Mid-Infrared/Radio Correlations in the Spitzer Extragalactic First Look Survey

By P. Appleton, D. Fadda, F. Marleau, D. Frayer, G. Helou, J. Condon, P. Choi, Lin Yan, M. Lacy, G. Wilson and 11 more. 2004

249 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Using the Spitzer Space Telescope and the Very Large Array (VLA), we present the first direct evidence that the well-known far-infrared/radio correlation is valid to cosmologically significant redshift. We also confirm, with improved statistics compared with previous surveys, a similar result for the mid-IR/radio correlation. We explore the dependence of monochromatic q24 and q70 on z. The results were obtained by matching Spitzer sources at 24 and 70 μm with VLA 1.4 GHz microjansky radio sources obtained for the Spitzer First Look Survey (FLS). Spectroscopic redshifts have been obtained for over 500 matched IR/radio sources using observations at WIYN and Keck, and archival Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) data extending out to z > 2. We find that q24 shows significantly more dispersion than q70. By comparing the observed fluxes at 70, 24, and 4.5 μm with a library of SED templates, we find that the larger dispersion in q24 is predictable in terms of systematic variations in spectral energy distribution (SED) shape throughout the population. Although the models are not able to encompass the full range of observed behavior (both the presence of either extremely flat or extremely steep IR SEDs), the fitting parameters were used to "k-correct" the higher z galaxies, which resulted in a reduced scatter in q. For comparison, we also corrected these data using the SED for M82. The results for 24 and 70 μm provide strong consistent evidence for the universality of the mid- and far-IR/radio correlations out to redshifts of at least z = 1.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2103633ea882e34d9ece503d857f6447e7fd99c1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. D. M. Alexander
  2. P. Hopkins
  3. L. Hernquist
  4. R. Dav'e
  5. R. Somerville
  6. Mark Dickinson
  7. E. Daddi
  8. Christopher J. Conselice

In Instrumentation

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. D. M. Alexander
  3. Christopher J. Conselice
  4. R. Dav'e
  5. L. Hernquist
  6. Mark Dickinson
  7. R. Somerville
  8. E. Daddi

Citations in the corpus