Cosmic evolution of submillimeter galaxies and their contribution to stellar mass assembly

By M. Michałowski, J. Hjorth, D. Watson. 2009

202 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The nature of galaxies selected at submillimeter wavelengths (SMGs, S 850 ≳ 3 mJy), some of the bolometrically most luminous objects at high redshifts, is still elusive. In particular their star formation histories and source of emission are not accurately constrained. In this paper we introduce a new approach to analyse the SMG data. Namely, we present the first self-consistent UV-to-radio spectral energy distribution fits of 76 SMGs with spectroscopic redshifts using all photometric datapoints from ultraviolet to radio simultaneously. We find that they are highly star-forming (median star formation rate 713 M ⊙ yr -1 for SMGs at z > 0.5), moderately dust-obscured (median A v ~ 2 mag), hosting significant stellar populations (median stellar mass 3.7 10 11 M ⊙ ) of which only a minor part has been formed in the ongoing starburst episode. This implies that in the past, SMGs experienced either another starburst episode or merger with several galaxies. The properties of SMGs suggest that they are progenitors of present-day elliptical galaxies. We find that these bright SMGs contribute significantly to the cosmic star formation rate density (~20%) and stellar mass density (~30-50%) at redshifts 2-4. Using number counts at low fluxes we find that as much as 80% of the cosmic star formation at these redshifts took place in SMGs brighter than 0.1 mJy. We find evidence that a linear infrared-radio correlation holds for SMGs in an ' unchanged form up to redshift of 3.6, though its normalization is offset from the local relation by a factor of ~2.1 towards higher radio luminosities. We present a compilation of photometry data of SMGs and determinations of cosmic SFR and stellar mass densities.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/39e51f89ee01b7cf6fbeaeed1b6b57c6d1fb3770

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. L. Hernquist
  3. D. Narayanan
  4. D. M. Alexander
  5. R. Dav'e
  6. R. Somerville
  7. Thomas J. Cox
  8. C. Casey

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. L. Hernquist
  3. Thomas J. Cox
  4. R. Ivison
  5. D. M. Alexander
  6. I. Smail
  7. D. Narayanan
  8. S. Chapman

Citations in the corpus