Spitzer Power-Law Active Galactic Nucleus Candidates in the Chandra Deep Field-North

By J. Donley, G. Rieke, P. Pérez-González, J. Rigby, A. Alonso-Herrero, U. Arizona, U. Madrid, Spain, Instituto de Estructura de la Materia, Csic. 2007

169 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We define a sample of 62 galaxies in the Chandra Deep Field-North whose Spitzer IRAC SEDs exhibit the characteristic power-law emission expected of luminous AGNs. We study the multiwavelength properties of this sample and compare the AGNs selected in this way to those selected via other Spitzer color-color criteria. Only 55% of the power-law galaxies are detected in the X-ray catalog at exposures of >0.5 Ms, although a search for faint emission results in the detection of 85% of the power-law galaxies at the ≥2.5 σ detection level. Most of the remaining galaxies are likely to host AGNs that are heavily obscured in the X-ray. Because the power-law selection requires the AGNs to be energetically dominant in the near- and mid-infrared, the power-law galaxies comprise a significant fraction of the Spitzer-detected AGN population at high luminosities and redshifts. The high 24 μm detection fraction also points to a luminous population. The power-law galaxies comprise a subset of color-selected AGN candidates. A comparison with various mid-infrared color selection criteria demonstrates that while the color-selected samples contain a larger fraction of the X-ray-luminous AGNs, there is evidence that these selection techniques also suffer from a higher degree of contamination by star-forming galaxies in the deepest exposures. Considering only those power-law galaxies detected in the X-ray catalog, we derive an obscured fraction of 68% (2 : 1). Including all of the power-law galaxies suggests an obscured fraction of <81% (4 : 1).

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/46b6fd786232d2b73b336023c2c4065dce5e6296

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. D. M. Alexander
  2. L. Hernquist
  3. P. Hopkins
  4. D. Narayanan
  5. Thomas J. Cox
  6. R. Dav'e
  7. R. Somerville
  8. Mark Dickinson

In Instrumentation

  1. D. M. Alexander
  2. L. Hernquist
  3. P. Hopkins
  4. D. Narayanan
  5. R. Dav'e
  6. Mark Dickinson
  7. E. Daddi
  8. A. Renzini

Citations in the corpus