SHARC-2 350 μm Observations of Distant Submillimeter-selected Galaxies

By A. Kovács, S. Chapman, C. Dowell, A. Blain, R. Ivison, I. Smail, T. Phillips. Astrophysical Journal, 2006

288 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present 350 μm observations of 15 Chapman et al. submillimeter galaxies (SMGs) with radio counterparts and optical redshifts. We detect 12 and obtain sensitive upper limits for three, providing direct, precise measurements of their far-infrared luminosities and characteristic dust temperatures. With these, we verify the linear radio-far-infrared correlation at redshifts of z ~ 1-3 and luminosities of 1011-1013 L☉, with a power-law index of 1.02 ± 0.12 and rms scatter of 0.12 dex. However, either the correlation constant q or the dust emissivity index β is lower than measured locally. The best-fitting q ≃ 2.14 is consistent with SMGs being predominantly starbust galaxies, without significant AGN contribution, at far-infrared wavelengths. Gas-to-dust mass ratios are estimated at 54 , depending on the absoption efficiency κν, with intrinsic dispersion ≃40% around the mean value. Dust temperatures consistent with 34.6 ± 3 K (1.5/β)0.71, at z ~ 1.5-3.5, suggest that far-infrared photometric redshifts may be viable, and perhaps accurate to 10% ≲ dz/(1 + z), for up to 80% of the SMG population in this range, if the above temperature characterizes the full range of SMGs. However, observed temperature evolution of Td ∝ (1 + z) is also plausible and could result from selection effects. From the observed luminosity-temperature (L-T) relation, L ∝ T, we derive scaling relations for dust mass versus dust temperature, and we identify expressions to interrelate the observed quantities. These suggest that measurements at a single wavelength, in the far-infrared, submillimeter, or radio wave bands, might constrain dust temperatures and far-infrared luminosities for most SMGs with redshifts at z ~ 0.5-4.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2b55b91a44c497f362aa7c6ca40dbeae538b567b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. L. Hernquist
  3. D. M. Alexander
  4. D. Narayanan
  5. R. Dav'e
  6. R. Somerville
  7. Thomas J. Cox
  8. F. Walter

In Instrumentation

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. L. Hernquist
  3. D. M. Alexander
  4. D. Narayanan
  5. R. Dav'e
  6. Thomas J. Cox
  7. R. Somerville
  8. C. Casey

Citations in the corpus