Store Wars: The Enactment and Repeal of Anti‐Chain‐Store Legislation in America1

By Paul Ingram, Hayagreeva Rao. American Journal of Sociology, 2004

180 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Marketing, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/20376033bd42aee8d984d97051dc850575ff80f5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Marketing

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Institutional Entrepreneurship in the Informal Economy: China's Shan-Zhai Mobile Phones (2014, background): “helps us focus on the microprocesses through which informal entrepreneurs brought about change in the regulatory framework (cf. Child, Lu, and Tsai, 2007; Ingram and Rao, 2004) and, thereby, achieved the possibility of legal standing.”
Entrepreneurship in Regulated Markets: Framing Contests and Collective Action to Introduce Pay TV in the U.S. (2014, background): “In a more recent study, Ingram and Rao (2004) showed how, despite their size disadvantage, independent grocery stores organized a social movement and achieved a temporary ban against supermarket chains entering the retail industry.”
Tilting at Windmills? The Environmental Movement and the Emergence of the U.S. Wind Energy Sector (2009, background): “Social movements and similar forms of collective action can shape industry regulation (Schneiberg and Bartley, 2001; Ingram and Rao, 2004; Schneiberg and Soule, 2005; Lee and Sine, 2007), facilitating the emergence and growth of new organizational forms.”
The Contentiousness of Markets: Politics, Social Movements, and Institutional Change in Markets (2010, background): “This new wave of scholarship continues to recognize the interrelatedness of governments and markets (e.g., Bartley 2003; Ingram & Rao 2004), but the state figures less prominently.”
The Coevolution of Institutional Entrepreneurship: A Tale of Two Theories (2010, background): “Ingram and Rao (2004) detailed the efforts of chain store owners to influence the legal environment and legitimize the chain store model.”
Market mediators and the tradeoffs of legitimacy-seeking behaviors in a nascent category (2014, unknown): “2011); downstream engagement of market intermediaries such as distributors and wholesalers may result in new resource dependencies and power asymmetries that can strain categorical boundaries; and state authorization can shift the “institutional arena” (Ingram and Rao, 2004) in which categorical mea”
Vive La Resistance: Competing Logics and the Consolidation of U.S. Community Banking (2007, background): “Opposition was mounted through the 2007 801Marquis and Lounsbury agency of trade associations (Ingram & Rao, 2004) organized with the explicit goal of lobbying units of government.”
Scaling Social Impact: Building Sustainable Social Ventures at the Base-of-the-Pyramid (2014, background): “…Kim 1997), standardization (Darr, Argote, and Epple 1995; Bradach 1998; Ingram and Baum 1997), transferring knowledge across geographically dispersed units (Sorenson and Sorensen 2001), and the ability to leverage the brand or political influence of the parent organization (Ingram and Rao 2004).”
Social Movements and Organizational Form: Cooperative Alternatives to Corporations in the American Insurance, Dairy, and Grain Industries (2008, methodology): “We conduct state-level analyses as states are key sites for regulating agricultural finance and trade (Ingram and Rao 2004; Schneiberg and Bartley 2001).”