Social Identity and the Romance of Leadership: The Importance of being Seen to be ‘Doing it for Us’

By S. A. Haslam, M. Platow, John C. Turner, Katherine J. Reynolds, Craig McGarty, P. Oakes, Susan Johnson, Michelle K. Ryan, Kristine Veenstra. 2001

155 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1f896ca9121397b9af0e47b606841a95dd1b90ff

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Presidential Charismatic Leadership: Exploring the Rhetoric of Social Change (2008, methodology): “We utilized Diction 5.0 ( Hart, 2000; 2001 ) to content analyze the frequency that each rhetorical strategy appears in each speech.”
Leadership as social identity management: Introducing the Identity Leadership Inventory (ILI) to assess and validate a four-dimensional model (2014, background): “…rather than their personal interests or those of other outgroups (e.g., Duck & Fielding, 2003; Giessner, van Knippenberg, van Ginkel, & Sleebos, 2013; Haslam et al., 2001; Jetten, Duck, Terry, & O'Brien, 2002; van Dick, Hirst, Grojean, & Wieseke, 2007; van Knippenberg & van Knippenberg, 2005).”
License to fail? How leader group prototypicality moderates the effects of leader performance on perceptions of leadership effectiveness (2008, methodology): “Following the performance manipulation, we included nine items adapted from different studies (Platow et al., 1997; Haslam et al., 2001) to measure perceived leadership effectiveness (e.”
Identity leadership going global: Validation of the Identity Leadership Inventory across 20 countries (2018, background): “An increasing body of empirical evidence speaks to the importance of each of these three dimensions for effective leadership (e.g., Haslam et al., 2001; Reicher, Haslam, & Hopkins, 2005; Steffens, Haslam, Kessler, & Ryan, 2013; van Dick, Hirst, Grojean, & Wieseke, 2007; for an overview, see also…”
Critique and review of leader–member exchange theory: Issues of agreement, consensus, and excellence (2010, background): “According to Haslam et al. (2001), leaders who are seen as enhancing social identity with the group are attributed more charisma and receive more positive evaluations in a crisis than other leaders.”