Shame and Guilt

By June P Tangney, R. Dearing. 2002

1,036 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1eed767e5044ac0fb5629520e6cba4e7f807b4d1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Feelings that Make a Difference: How Guilt and Pride Convince Consumers of the Effectiveness of Sustainable Consumption Choices (2014, background): “Third, guilt is a negative feeling experienced by consumers when they reflect on previous behavior and realize that their conduct does not match personal goals, norms, or standards (Baumeister et al. 1995; Gilbert 2003; Tangney and Dearing 2002).”
Cross-Domain Effects of Guilt on Desire for Self-Improvement Products (2015, methodology): “Envy focuses on social comparison and status (Smith and Kim 2007) whereas guilt focuses on the self and moral violations (Tangney and Dearing 2002).”
Experiences of pride, not guilt, predict pro-environmental behavior when pro-environmental descriptive norms are more positive (2016, background): “According to functionalist theories of emotion, guilt leads to reparative action and increased future effort (Barrett, 1995; Tangney & Dearing, 2002).”
Shame Expressions Reduce the Recipient’s Insult from Outgroup Reparations (2008, background): “Such consequences are consistent with an extensive literature at the interpersonal level, in which guilt has been investigated in tandem with shame (Tangney & Dearing, 2002).”
Perfectionism and the experience of pride, shame, and guilt: Comparing healthy perfectionists, unhealthy perfectionists, and non-perfectionists (2007, background): “Pride, shame, and guilt are termed self-conscious emotions because they are emotions that fundamentally involve an evaluation of the self (Tangney, 2002; Tangney & Dearing, 2002).”
The relation between value priorities and proneness to guilt, shame, and empathy (2008, methodology): “Women and girls score higher than men and boys in proneness to empathy, guilt, and shame (e.g., Tangney and Dearing 2002; Ferguson and Eyre 2000; Davis 1994).”
Shame Resilience Theory: A Grounded Theory Study on Women and Shame (2006, background): “…from the data in this study strongly supports the early study conducted by Lewis (1971) and many current qualitative and quantitative studies that distinguish guilt and shame as separate constructs (Dearing et al., 2005; Ferguson, 2000; Hartling et al., 2000; Mason, 1991; Tangney & Dearing, 2002).”