Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis.

By K. Widaman. 2012

175 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Management Science and Operations Research, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1e8dcfcf04c9f93551b92b7dc2a00c081c227b52

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Networks and Communications

1. B. Shuck
2. D. Goretzko
3. Trang Huong Pham
4. Thomas G. Reio Jr.
5. M. Bühner

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. B. Shuck
2. D. Goretzko
3. Trang Huong Pham
4. Thomas G. Reio Jr.
5. M. Bühner
6. M. Gunkel

In Social Psychology

1. B. Shuck
2. D. Goretzko
3. Trang Huong Pham
4. Thomas G. Reio Jr.
5. M. Bühner
6. Suthinee Rurkkhum
7. K. Bartlett
8. Emily M. Grossnickle

Citations in the corpus

• Exploratory factor analysis: Current use, methodological developments and recommendations for good practice (2019, methodology): “Depending on the particular data, more than one method can be tried though and results can be examined for matching patterns as suggested by Widaman (2012).”
• Exploratory Factor Analysis (2015, methodology): “More recently, participant-to-variable ratios ranging from 5:1 to 10:1 rather than sample size have been touted as being more useful for analysis (Widaman, 2012).”