Optimizing Population Screening of Bullying in School-Aged Children

By T. Vaillancourt, V. Trinh, Patricia McDougall, E. Duku, Lesley J. Cunningham, C. Cunningham, Shelley Hymel, Kathy Short. 2010

173 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Education, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1ceaef59311b312dc94be299270a08e49876baaf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. T. Vaillancourt
2. Shelley Hymel
3. Gary W. Giumetti
4. Amber N. Schroeder
5. Robin M. Kowalski
6. Micah R. Lattanner
7. P. Jonason

In Education

1. Elizabeth Whittaker
2. Gary W. Giumetti
3. Amber N. Schroeder
4. Micah R. Lattanner
5. Shelley Hymel
6. Robin M. Kowalski
7. T. Vaillancourt

In Social Psychology

1. Shelley Hymel
2. Elizabeth Whittaker
3. T. Vaillancourt
4. Gary W. Giumetti
5. Amber N. Schroeder
6. Micah R. Lattanner
7. Ellen Shumka
8. Robin M. Kowalski

Citations in the corpus

• Bullying in the digital age: a critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. (2014, background): “More specifically, Vaillancourt et al. (2010) found that measurement sensitivity was lower when using the global, single-item questions of the Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire compared to a series of questions asking about specific forms of bullying (e.g., verbal, social, physical, and cyber).”
• Cyberbullying Via Social Media (2015, background): “Typically, prevalence estimates for cyberbullying are lower when single-item measures are used as opposed to when more specific items inquire about cyberbullying that occurs through particular venues (Kowalski et al., 2014; Menesini, Nocentini, & Calussi, 2011; Vaillancourt et al., 2010).”
• Addressing school bullying: Insights from theories of group processes (2015, background): “For example, teachers' capacity to influence group processes may be greater during the elementary school years, prior to the age when bullying reaches a peak (e.g., Currie et al., 2012; Vaillancourt et al., 2010) and peers become a priority (Bukowski, Brendgen & Vitaro, 2006), and in contexts in whi”
• Peer victimization and depression in children with and without motor coordination difficulties (2012, methodology): “Participants completed a self-report screening measure about their experiences with bullying using procedures and questions validated in a population-based study of nearly 17,000 Canadian schoolchildren aged 8 to 19 years (Vaillancourt et al., 2010).”