Are facilitated mentoring programs beneficial? A randomized experimental field study

By T. Egan, Zhaoli Song. 2008

102 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Education, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1cd9f86c05cc7efa779ca0d1a31aa31da6b18dfd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Jeffrey Yip
2. S. Murphy
3. K. Kram
4. Ellen A. Ensher
5. Dawn Chandler
6. Nikos Bozionelos
7. Catherine Kirchmeyer
8. Vicki L. Sweitzer

In Education

1. Dawn Chandler
2. Jeffrey Yip
3. Ellen A. Ensher
4. S. Murphy
5. K. Kram
6. Nikos Bozionelos
7. Catherine Kirchmeyer
8. Russell L. Huizing

In Social Psychology

1. Ellen A. Ensher
2. S. Murphy
3. Dawn Chandler
4. Jeffrey Yip
5. K. Kram
6. Nikos Bozionelos
7. Catherine Kirchmeyer
8. Russell L. Huizing

Citations in the corpus

• The Mentoring Relationship Challenges Scale: The impact of mentoring stage, type, and gender (2011, background): “Egan and Song (2008) conducted a randomized experimental study and found that protégés in highly facilitated formal mentoring programs reported greater job performance and organizational fit than those in low-level facilitated programs.”
• An Ecological Systems Perspective on Mentoring at Work: A Review and Future Prospects (2011, background): “…study suggests high-level facilitation mentoring programs—those that provide ongoing facilitation and training versus a basic matching process at a program’s onset—have more positive effects than low-level facilitation programs on work-related attitudes, cognition, and behavior (Egan & Song, 2008).”