Critical Realism and Affordances: Theorizing IT-Associated Organizational Change Processes
By Olga Volkoff, Diane M. Strong. MIS Q., 2013
569 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1c721c020dfb51c345c81fe5fb4939ba80ce4b47
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Ann Majchrzak
- Paul M. Leonardi
- Michael D. Myers
- Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi
- Sven Laumer
- Ivano Cardinale
- Satish Nambisan
- Joanne Locke
In Sociology and Political Science
- Ann Majchrzak
- M. Markus
- Jonathan Wareham
- Paul M. Leonardi
- Mayasandra-Nagaraja Ravishankar
- Michael D. Myers
- Deborah Bunker
- Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi
Citations in the corpus
- Designing for Digital Transformation: Lessons for Information Systems Research from the Study of ICT and Societal Challenges (2016, background): “…and constraints theory (Faraj and Azad 2012; Gibson 1977, 1979; Leonardi 2011, 2013; Majchrzak and Markus 2014; Markus and Silver 2008; Treem and Leonardi 2012; Volkoff and Strong 2013; Zammuto et al. 2007) is a lens that is particularly well suited to help IS scholars build theory about ICT use.”
- Theoretical foundations for the study of sociomateriality (2013, background): “Mutch (2002, 2010, this issue), Volkoff, Strong, and colleagues (Strong & Volkoff, 2010; Volkoff & Strong, 2013; Volkoff et al., 2007), and Faulkner and Runde (2013), have described the theoretical stance of critical realism – especially as it relates to studies of technology and organizing – well…”
- Research on information systems failures and successes: Status update and future directions (2014, result): “This is consistent with the ideas proposed by Strong and Volkoff (2010) and the general philosophical stance of critical realism (e.g. Volkoff and Strong 2013; Zachariadis et al. 2013).”