Point Estimation, Hypothesis Testing, and Interval Estimation Using the RMSEA: Some Comments and a Reply to Hayduk and Glaser
By J. Steiger. 2000
321 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1c2f369df2a70e75f3d68464303fbb0148cbcaeb
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Statistics and Probability
- Victoria Savalei
- Kenneth A. Bollen
- P. Curran
- Feinian Chen
- James B. Kirby
- Pamela Paxton
- J. Hansen
- M. Martens
Citations in the corpus
- Use of interactive–informal assessment practices: New Zealand secondary students' conceptions of assessment (2009, unknown): “10 may still be of interest and of value in developing our understanding of the real world (Steiger, 2000).”
- Leader Self and Means Efficacy: A multi-component approach (2012, background): “For example, although some scholars have recommended a cutoff value for RMSEA (Hu & Bentler, 1999; MacCallum, Browne, & Sugawara, 1996), others have cautioned researchers about the use of precise numerical cutoff points for RMSEA (e.g., Hayduk & Glaser, 2000; Marsh et al., 2004; Steiger, 2000); and ”
- Self-control behind bars: A validation study of the Grasmick et al. scale (2003, methodology): “Although previous researchers (e.g., Vazsonyi et al., 2001) have used RMSEA .1 as a good fit, others (e.g., Steiger, 1998, 2000) have suggested that RMSEA values of .05 or less are obviously more acceptable.”
- Fear of Death and Supernatural Beliefs: Developing A New Supernatural Belief Scale to Test the Relationship (2013, unknown): “…Curran, Bollen, Kirby, & Paxton, 2008; Goffin, 2007; Hopwood & Donnellan, 2010; Jackson, Gillaspy, & Purc-Stephenson, 2009; Marsh, Hau, & Wen, 2004; Steiger, 2000, 2007) because the optimal cut-offs depend on the interplay of model characteristics, type of misspecification, and sample size (Fan &…”
- The associations in our heads belong to us: Searching for attitudes and knowledge in implicit evaluation (2008, background): “benefits of parsimony are considered along with fit (Steiger, 2000).”
- Five reinforcement sensitivity theory (RST) of personality questionnaires: Comparison, validity and generalization (2016, methodology): “As model fit indices, we used: (a) Sattora-Bentler scaled chi-square (χ(2)) (Bentler, 2006; Satorra & Bentler, 2001); (b) the rootmean squared error of approximation (RMSEA; Steiger, 2000), where values of b .”
- The positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS): construct validity, measurement properties and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. (2004, methodology): “The fit of CFA models was assessed using the Satorra-Bentler scaled w2 statistic (S-Bw2), the robust comparative fit index (RCFI), the standardized root mean squared residual (SRMR) and the root mean squared error of approximation (RMSEA; Steiger, 2000).”
- Structural Equations Modeling: Fit Indices, Sample Size, and Advanced Topics (2010, methodology): “The RMSEA is an index that sounds somewhat like the SRMR but it is computed differently and it behaves differently (Steiger, 2000).”
- Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21) (2018, methodology): “…used to assess model fit: the comparative fit index (CFI > 0.90) (Bentler, 1990), the Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI > 0.90) (Tucker & Lewis, 1973), the root mean square of approximation (RMSEA 0.08) (Steiger, 2000), and the standardised root mean square residual (SRMR 0.08) (Joreskog & Sorbom, 1996).”
- The Relationship Between Root Mean Square Error of Approximation and Model Misspecification in Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models (2012, methodology): “5), one can falsely conclude that the one-factor model is an accurate fit for the data that were generated by 8 underlying factors! The phenomenon in Figure 3B illustrates RMSEA’s sensitivity to the average inter-item correlation (Steiger, 2000).”
- The Use of Structural Equation Modeling in Counseling Psychology Research (2005, methodology): “Third, despite several articles that provided compelling evidence against the use of certain fit indices (e.g., Hu & Bentler, 1998; Marsh et al., 1988; Steiger, 2000), indices such as the (2)/df ratio and the normed fit index continue to be used in several SEM studies.”
- An Empirical Evaluation of the Use of Fixed Cutoff Points in RMSEA Test Statistic in Structural Equation Models (2008, background): “Other researchers echoed the point by suggesting that the use of precise numerical cutoff points for RMSEA should not be taken too seriously (Hayduk and Glaser 2000, Steiger 2000).”
- High commitment HR practices, the employment relationship and job performance: A test of a mediation model (2016, unknown): “RMSEA > 0.10 is generally unacceptable (Steiger, 2000).”