The Use of Structural Equation Modeling in Counseling Psychology Research

By M. Martens. 2005

200 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Computer Networks and Communications, Developmental and Educational Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d22443768597d3ae5662b9e24dac9a5438b968e2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Erika R. Carr
2. Dawn M. Szymanski
3. R. Haase
4. A. Winefield
5. Maureen Dollard
6. Rebecca Purc-Stephenson
7. Dennis L. Jackson
8. J. A. Gillaspy

In Computer Networks and Communications

1. Rebecca Purc-Stephenson
2. J. A. Gillaspy
3. Dawn M. Szymanski
4. R. Haase
5. Erika R. Carr
6. Dennis L. Jackson
7. Maureen Dollard
8. A. Winefield

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Erika R. Carr
2. Dawn M. Szymanski
3. R. Haase
4. Rebecca Purc-Stephenson
5. Dennis L. Jackson
6. Maureen Dollard
7. J. A. Gillaspy
8. A. Winefield

Citations in the corpus

• Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: an overview and some recommendations. (2009, methodology): “Similar trends have been noted within subdisciplines of psychology (e.g., Martens, 2005; Raykov, Tomer, & Nesselroade, 1991) as well as in other fields such as marketing and consumer research (Baumgartner & Homburg, 1996).”
• Work‐family conflict in East vs Western countries (2010, methodology): “These fit indices were chosen because they were influenced mainly by the model misspecification rather than other factors and could be generalized across samples rather well (Martens, 2005).”
• Influential Factors in Academic and Career Self‐Efficacy: Attachment, Supports, and Career Barriers (2014, methodology): “However, the chi-square does represent a stringent exact fit (Martens, 2005) or perfect fit of the model to the data (Steiger, 2007), and others have discouraged rejecting models based solely on the chi-square value (Kline, 2011; Steiger, 2007).”
• Male gender role conflict and willingness to seek counseling : Testing a mediation model on college-aged men (2007, unknown): “the standardized root-mean-square residual (SRMR; " .08; see Hu & Bentler, 1999; Martens, 2005).”
• A Brief Guide to Structural Equation Modeling (2006, background): “Hoyle and Panter (1995) have recommended that researchers report several indices of overall model fit, a practice that many have followed (Martens, 2005).”
• The roles of gender role conflict and internalized heterosexism in gay and bisexual men's psychological distress: Testing two mediation models. (2008, methodology): “Thus, we based the adequacy of the measurement and structural model fit on the following goodness-of- fit indexes that minimize the effect of extrinsic factors: comparative fit index (CFI), Tucker Lewis index (TLI), incremental fit index (IFI), and root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA; Ma”
• Advanced Applications of Structural Equation Modeling in Counseling Psychology Research (2006, methodology): “Structural equation modeling (SEM) is a data-analytic technique increasing in popularity during the past several years (Martens, 2005; Steiger, 2001; Weston & Gore, 2006 [TCP, special issue, part 1]; for other techniques in this special issue, see Helms, Henze, Sass, & Mifsud, 2006 [TCP, special…”