Five reinforcement sensitivity theory (RST) of personality questionnaires: Comparison, validity and generalization

By D. Krupić, Philip J. Corr, S. Ručević, Valerija Križanić, A. Gračanin. 2016

119 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/095b9643981a201d794372e992265d19a471e56e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Philip J. Corr
2. N. McNaughton
3. Colin G. DeYoung
4. Luke D. Smillie
5. Nathan A. Kimbrel
6. C. Jackson

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Philip J. Corr
2. Luke D. Smillie
3. C. Jackson

In Social Psychology

1. Philip J. Corr
2. Jacob B Hirsh
3. Eric M. Anicich

Citations in the corpus

• Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory of Personality Questionnaires: Structural survey with recommendations (2016, background): “The first thing to note is that confirmatory factor analysis of these separate questionnaires generally yield adequate model fit estimates; however, when convergent validity between these questionnaires is inspected problems are found (Krupić et al., 2015).”