An Experimental Analysis of Trust and Trustworthiness

By Ananish Chaudhuri, Lata Gangadharan. 2007

191 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1bb97e26e736624927c27d1563f8f4d69f55befc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Dictator games: a meta study (2011, background): “…2007; Benenson, Pascoe et al. 2007; Branas-Garza 2007; Broberg, Ellingsen et al. 2007; Brosig, Riechmann et al. 2007; Cappelen, Hole et al. 2007; Chaudhuri and Gangadharan 2007; Fisman, Kariv et al. 2007; Fong 2007; Knafo and Israel 2007; List 2007; Stanton 2007; Vanberg 2007; Whitt and Wilson…”
Charitable Giving as a Signal of Trustworthiness: Disentangling the Signaling Benefits of Altruistic Acts (2013, background): “Cox (2004) was the first to experimentally combine the dictator game (Forsythe, Horowitz, Savin, & Sefton, 1994) and the investment game (Berg, Dickhaut, & McCabe, 1995) to disentangle trustworthiness expectations from other motives behind trusters' decisions.”
Gender differences in charitable giving (2011, unknown): “…strong evidence indicating that women are more altruistic and generous, and more likely to reciprocate than men (e.g., (Buchan et al., 2008)) (Chaudhuri & Gangadharan, 2007) (Croson & Buchan, 1999) (Dufwenberg & Muren, 2006) (Eckel & Grossman, 1998) (Kamas et al., 2008) (Schwieren & Sutter,…”
Paradoxes and mechanisms for choice under risk (2014, unknown): “PAI has recently been used in experiments with role reversal in trust games that involve risks from defection (Burks, Carpenter, and Verhoogen 2003; Chaudhuri and Gangadharan, 2007).”
Who Makes a Good Leader? Cooperativeness, Optimism, and Leading‐By‐Example (2012, background): “For example Altmann, Dohmen, and Wibral (2008) and Chaudhuri and Gangadharan (2007) both find that trustees who reciprocate more are more trusting in trust games.”
Why are Economists so Different? Nature, Nurture and Gender Effects in a Simple Trust Game (2014, unknown): “At the same time, females tend to be more trustworthy (once they are trusted by others) if gender effects can be identified (see, e.g., Croson and Buchan, 1999; Schwieren and Sutter, 2008; Chaudhuri and Gangadharan, 2007).”
Trust games: A meta-analysis (2011, unknown): “…50 98 3 U U U U U Carter and Castillo (2011) South Africa 283 2.77 53 72 3 U U U U Castillo and Carter (2003) Honduras 758 6.83 49 126 3 U U U Charness, Cobo-Reyes et al. (2008) USA 96 5.00 37 125 3 U U U U U U U Chaudhuri and Gangadharan (2007) Australia 100 7.10 43 95 3 U U U U U U U 882 N .”
Gender Differences in Preferences (2009, background): “And women are more reciprocal in trust games than men (Croson and Buchan 1999; Buchan, Croson, and Solnick 2008; Chaudhuri and Gangadharan 2007; Snijders and Keren 2001; Schwieren and Sutter 2008).”
Trust: An Integrative Review from a Person–Situation Perspective (2015, background): “…with a proself SVO or a low willingness to cooperate in either game (Ashraf et al., 2006; Ben-Ner & Halldorsson, 2010; Bohnet & Baytelman, 2007; Chaudhuri & Gangadharan, 2007; Cox, 2004; Etang et al., 2011; Kanagaretnam, Mestelman, Nainar, & Shehata, 2009; Macko et al., 2014; Sapienza et al.,…”