Trust games: A meta-analysis
By N. Johnson, Alexandra Mislin. 2011
940 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Demography, General Decision Sciences, Safety Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3a0e62b6e5629d3a283e744f0e02b9421466719d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Demography
- Tom Lane
- Giovanni Di Bartolomeo
- Stefano Papa
- N. Johnson
- Alexandra Mislin
- Collin Raymond
- Benjamin E. Hilbig
- Dustin Tingley
In General Decision Sciences
- Tom Lane
- Giovanni Di Bartolomeo
- Stefano Papa
- N. Johnson
- Alexandra Mislin
- Collin Raymond
- Daniele Nosenzo
- Benjamin E. Hilbig
In Safety Research
- Tom Lane
- N. Johnson
- Giovanni Di Bartolomeo
- Stefano Papa
- Alexandra Mislin
- Isabel Thielmann
- Collin Raymond
- Daniele Nosenzo
Citations in the corpus
- The Influence of Emotion on Trust (2016, background): “The Nash Equilibrium prediction for this game is for the sender to keep all five dollars and for the receiver to keep any amount that the sender does send, though experiments with a variety of populations find that subjects send and return positive amounts (Johnson and Mislin 2011).”
- How Much Should We Trust the World Values Survey Trust Question (2012, methodology): “The data are also reproduced in their entirety in the appendix to Johnson and Mislin (2011).”
- Discrimination in the laboratory: A meta-analysis of economics experiments (2016, background): “…– group cooperation in prisoners’ dilemmas; Hopfensitz (2009) – the effects of reference dependence and the gambler’s fallacy on investment; Percoco and Nijkamp (2009) – time discounting; Weiszäcker (2010) – social learning; Engel (2011) – dictator games; Johnson and Mislin (2011) – trust games.”
- Trust: An Integrative Review from a Person–Situation Perspective (2015, background): “…(a) implies uncertainty and risk,2 1 Specifically, research on trust behavior has mainly considered the trust game (Camerer & Weigelt, 1988; Dasgupta, 1988; Kreps, 1990), also known as the investment game (Berg, Dickhaut, & McCabe, 1995; for a meta-analytic review see Johnson & Mislin, 2011).”
- Preferences for Truth‐Telling (2016, background): “Positive reciprocity is often measured by the behavior of second-mover subjects in trust games who forgo on average 38c out of each $1 (Johnson and Mislin 2011; Cardenas and Carpenter 2008).”
- The Effects of Physical Activity on Social Interactions: The Case of Trust and Trustworthiness (2019, background): “Then, their results have been replicated hundreds of times in many variants (see, for a meta-analysis, Johnson and Mislin, 2011).”