Deviance Regulation: A Theory of Action and Identity

By Hart Blanton, Charlene Christie. 2003

238 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1b95ad4e903479754b1ad6e9c6315e768dd51ac9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

1. Nick Haslam
2. Adam Waytz
3. E. Paluck
4. Shefali V. Patil
5. Liane L. Young
6. Adam M. Grant
7. Noah J. Goldstein
8. Nicole Heilbron

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Nick Haslam
2. Adam Waytz
3. E. Paluck
4. Liane L. Young
5. Noah J. Goldstein
6. Adam M. Grant
7. Robert B. Cialdini
8. Yufei Yuan

Citations in the corpus

• Peer influence and adolescent nonsuicidal self-injury: A theoretical review of mechanisms and moderators (2008, methodology): “In contrast to the prototype model, Blanton and Christie’s eviance regulation theory (DRT; Blanton & Christie, 2003) emphaizes that behavior may be motivated by the desire to achieve a alance between similarity and differentiation from their peers. he challenge in achieving this balance is to…”
• The psychology of whistleblowing (2015, background): “As a result, attempts to encourage whistleblowing solely by prioritizing the need to root out criminal activity or organizational injustice may only encourage employees who are low in loyalty at baseline to blow the whistle [18,32–34,35 ,36].”
• Understanding Nonmalicious Security Violations in the Workplace: A Composite Behavior Model (2011, background): “In Blanton and christie’s terms [9], security-related behaviors do not “stick” to the identity of a business professional.”
• Challenging the Norm of Self-Interest: Minority Influence and Transitions to Helping Norms in Work Units (2012, background): “…dissenting against norms can result in social rewards, praise, and acceptance under certain conditions (Abrams, Marques, Bown, & Dougill, 2002; Blanton & Christie, 2003; Hornsey & Jetten, 2004; Warren, 2003), there are also several costs involved in dissenting against unit norms, including…”
• Social influence: compliance and conformity. (2004, background): “Deviating from the attitudes and actions of others at times may also act in service of these self-esteem-related goals by helping to provide individuals with a sense of uniqueness and personal identity (Blanton & Christie 2003, Kim & Markus 1999, Nail et al. 2000).”
• Disentangling Risk and Change (2015, background): “These similar others provide information and identity signals for managers, and individuals are concerned with comparisons within this group and are motivated to avoid a negative identity (Blanton and Christie, 2003).”
• Moderators of the relationship between implicit and explicit evaluation. (2005, background): “Highly distinctive evaluations may be defining features of the self-concept (Blanton & Christie, 2003).”
• Norm Perception as a Vehicle for Social Change (2016, background): “This motivation arises from distinct but related desires to be accurate about social facts, to feel that they belong to their community, and to avoid social rejection from their community for deviating too far from the norm (Blanton & Christie, 2003; Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004).”
• Dimensions of Folk Psychiatry (2005, background): “this view, Blanton and Christie (2003) showed”