A Systematic Review of the Corporate Reputation Literature: Definition, Measurement, and Theory
By Kent Walker. 2010
894 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Communication, Marketing, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1b8bb99420ca7418d8713a8a431d66b97b99c1ba
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Communication
- Nadine Gatzert
- Petros Vourvachis
- T. Woodward
- Hamed M. Shamma
- Ivan Ka Wai Lai
- T. Melewar
- Richard Lynch
- Zhongqi Jin
In Marketing
- Nadine Gatzert
- Petros Vourvachis
- T. Woodward
- Hamed M. Shamma
- Ivan Ka Wai Lai
- T. Melewar
- Zhongqi Jin
- Richard Lynch
In Strategy and Management
- Nadine Gatzert
- Petros Vourvachis
- T. Woodward
- Hamed M. Shamma
- Ivan Ka Wai Lai
- T. Melewar
- Zhongqi Jin
- Richard Lynch
Citations in the corpus
- The moderating influences on the relationship of corporate reputation with its antecedents and consequences: A meta-analytic review (2015, methodology): “Given this value-creating resource, numerous research studies have been conducted into the antecedents and consequences of corporate reputation (Chun, 2005; Walker, 2010).”
- Do corporate image and reputation drive brand equity in India and China? - Similarities and differences (2017, background): “For product brand equity, the key stakeholders are potential and actual customers (Walker, 2010) and they are thus the target of corporate branding endeavours to raise the corporate image (Abratt & Kleyn, 2012).”
- Toward a Comprehensive Understanding of Corporate Reputation: Concept, Measurement and Implications (2012, background): “Walker (2010) divided corporate reputation definitions into 5 groups: (1) perceptual definitions which focus on defining corporate reputation as stakeholder’s viewpoints about the overall perceptions regarding both internal and external aspects about an organization, (2) aggregate definitions which…”
- From Doing Good to Looking Even Better: The Dynamics of CSR and Reputation (2019, background): “As an overall measure of reputation, MAC continues to be the most widely used measure of reputation (Walker, 2010; Walker & Dyke, 2014).”
- The Harm of Symbolic Actions and Green-Washing: Corporate Actions and Communications on Environmental Performance and Their Financial Implications (2012, background): “First, prior research typically discusses environmental performance as an all-encompassing construct, similar to reputation (i.e., see review, Walker 2010).”
- The Impact of Corporate Reputation and Reputation Damaging Events on Financial Performance: Empirical Evidence from the Literature (2015, methodology): “Toward this end, the Web of Science database was used as one of the largest databases, which includes a large range of disciplines (see also Walker, 2010, p. 359).”
- Linking corporate social responsibility to corporate reputation: A study on understanding behavioral consequences (2012, background): “This theory is particularly instrumental in explaining how corporate social performance influences reputation given the preeminence of marketing efforts that highlight the social responsibility of companies (Walker, 2010).”
- Corporate social responsibility, the cost of equity capital and ownership structure: An analysis of Chinese listed firms (2015, background): “However, the reputation index has always been criticized for its subjectivity (Fryxell and Wang, 1994), and TRI and the generosity index reflect only a few of the factors that constitute CSR (Walker, 2010).”
- Hotel image and reputation on building customer loyalty: An empirical study in Macau (2019, background): “Therefore, the corporate image can be described as the desired image for which an organization would like people to think about it (Walker, 2010).”