The moderating influences on the relationship of corporate reputation with its antecedents and consequences: A meta-analytic review
By Raza Ali, Richard Lynch, T. Melewar, Zhongqi Jin. 2015
214 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Through a meta-analytical approach, we test the antecedents and consequences of corporate reputation, examining specifically the moderating roles of three study variables: country of study, stakeholder group, and reputational measure. The study presents a comprehensive overview of three moderating factors for the relationship of corporate reputation with its antecedents and consequences in the literature from 101 quantitative studies. Our findings suggest that practitioners need to exercise considerable caution when developing and managing the reputation of their organizations through the use of research evidence from various countries, with different stakeholder groups and when employing diverse reputational measures.
Subfields: Communication, Marketing, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c84d4e5ed19bb2d1e373553e966cb4371220723f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Communication
In Marketing
In Strategy and Management
Citations in the corpus
- The Impact of Corporate Reputation and Reputation Damaging Events on Financial Performance: Empirical Evidence from the Literature (2015, methodology): “Furthermore, Ali et al. (2015) conduct a meta-analytical review of 101 quantitative studies with focus on the moderating roles of three factors, including stakeholder group, country of study, and reputational measure, which are of relevance for the relation between antecedents of reputation (e.g.…”