Competition and Business Strategy in Historical Perspective

By Pankaj Ghemawat. Business History Review, 2002

415 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Strategy as Practice and the Narrative Turn (2011, methodology): “, both institutions that enact strategy as a management practice, are also products of the Harvard Business School (Ghemawat, 2002).”
Taking Strategy Seriously (2003, neutral): “In his history of the developing strategy field, Ghemawat (2002) noted a significant change in recent years: “Unlike, say, twenty-five or thirty years ago, truly large amounts of money are at stake, and are actively competed for, in the development of ‘blockbuster’ ideas” (p. 73).”
Strategic management of business model transformation: lessons from Nokia (2011, background): “Strategic tools, such as product market matrices, are often used to cluster corporate business units into various categories (e.g. “stars”, “question marks”, “cash cows”, “dogs” in the classic BCG matrix; see Ghemawat, 2002).”
Strategic entrepreneurship: Creating competitive advantage through streams of innovation (2007, background): “1, strategy is concerned with the firm’s long-term development (Ghemawat, 2002).”