My time or yours? Managing time visions in global virtual teams

By Carol Stoak Saunders, Craig Van Slyke, D. Vogel. 2004

238 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1b6efcd604776e4f72a92c2872e8cbd6cfbff949

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

1. Manju K. Ahuja
2. Karen J. Jansen
3. Liz Lee-Kelley
4. Carol Stoak Saunders
5. Abbie J. Shipp
6. T. Sankey

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Manju K. Ahuja
2. Karen J. Jansen
3. Carol Stoak Saunders
4. Abbie J. Shipp

In Social Psychology

1. Manju K. Ahuja
2. Karen J. Jansen
3. Liz Lee-Kelley
4. Carol Stoak Saunders
5. Abbie J. Shipp
6. T. Sankey

Citations in the corpus

• The “Other” Time: A Review of the Subjective Experience of Time in Organizations (2020, background): “example, in both the seminal and full review, some papers portrayed event time as truly subjective—interpreting and imbuing events with meaning, which was generally created through social construction (e.g., Perlow, 1999; Saunders et al., 2004).”
• Go (Con)figure: Subgroups, Imbalance, and Isolates in Geographically Dispersed Teams (2009, unknown): “For example, teams spanning multiple time zones often experience significant challenges coordinating schedules and deliverables (e.g. Espinosa and Carmel 2003; Espinosa and Pickering 2006; Massey et al. 2003; Rutkowski et al. 2007; Saunders et al. 2004).”
• Global virtual teams for value creation and project success: A case study (2008, background): “[27] offer four cultural dimensions of time (western linear clock time, oriental cyclical eventbased time, Hindu or Buddhist conception of time as limitless and Taoist or Confucian emphasis on balance or harmonic time) in which differing senses of time and urgency in a team can prevent shared apprec”
• Behavioral adaptation within cross-cultural virtual teams (2006, background): “The technology itself, the issue of perceptions of time [20], and the behavior of team members are all relevant factors.”
• Are All Distributed Teams the Same? Differentiating Between Temporary and Ongoing Distributed Teams (2006, methodology): “Rather, we are using a classification scheme that is more consistent with the widely used “clock” view of time ( Saunders, Van Slyke, & Vogel, 2004 ), which views time as a resource that can be divided into distinct homogeneous units and that frequently employs deadlines.”