The Great Disruption
By Clayton M. Christensen, Thomas Craig, S. Hart. 2001
569 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Political Science and International Relations
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1b33f5bea30f82add4cbbbd54908d20acc062cd3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Political Science and International Relations
- S. Hart
- T. London
- Anna Bergek
- Mario Pansera
- M. Enright
- Paulo N. Figueiredo *
- Martin Bell
- John H. Dunning
Citations in the corpus
- Crafting Sustainable Development Solutions: Frugal Innovations of Grassroots Entrepreneurs (2016, background): “, blowback [34] and reverse [19] innovations and the opportunity to leverage them to overcome the limits of saturated and resource-intensive markets in developed economies [35–38].”
- Technological discontinuities and the challenge for incumbent firms: destruction, disruption or creative accumulation? (2013, background): “reliability, convenience or cost (Christensen et al., 2001).”
- On the Empirics of Social Capital (2002, unknown): “That being said, the following definition by Fukuyama (1999) seems to capture many of the intuitions that have driven this literature.”
- Reinventing strategies for emerging markets: beyond the transnational model (2004, background): “There has been considerable debate over the challenges of creating disruptive innovations (Christensen, 1997), and it has been suggested that the base of the pyramid may offer a unique opportunity to incubate disruptive technologies (Christensen et al., 2001; Hart and Christensen, 2002).”
- A Cognitive Perspective on the Business Case for Corporate Sustainability (2015, unknown): “…is that by focusing on the unmet needs of low-income populations firms can create profitable markets at what they call the base of the pyramid (BOP), while also helping the poor address some of their most urgent needs (Christensen et al., 2001; Prahalad and Hammond, 2002; Prahalad and Hart, 2002).”
- Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory (2004, background): “Disruptive innovations (Christensen and Overdorf, 2000; Christensen et al., 2001) are products or services that do not have the same capabilities and conditions as those being used by customers in the mainstream markets; as a result they can be introduced only for new or less demanding applications ”
- New frontiers in international strategy (2004, background): “Early work (e.g., Hart and Milstein, 1999; Christensen et al., 2001; Hart and Christensen, 2002; Prahalad and Hammond, 2002; Prahalad and Hart, 2002) focused on articulating the strategic logic for pursing business strategies aimed at the four billion poor at the base of the pyramid.”
- The emergence of sustainable industries: building on natural capital (2003, background): “This is precisely what is occurring with photovoltaics and several other sustainable technologies, which are enjoying significant growth in off-grid locations in less developed countries (Christensen, Craig, and Hart, 2001).”