What Are Implicit Measures and Why Are We Using Them

By J. de Houwer. 2006

556 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1a6fbd3c7183f00c45c4ec963036a04b8c1d8a2d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

Citations in the corpus

Using the Implicit Association Test and the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure to Measure Attitudes Toward Meat and Vegetables in Vegetarians and Meat-Eaters (2010, unknown): “Such measures, it has been argued, must meet one or more of the following criteria: Participants (a) are not aware that the targeted attitude is being measured; (b) do not have conscious access to the attitude; or (c) have limited control over the outcome of the measure (see De Houwer, 2006).”
Implicit measures: A normative analysis and review. (2009, methodology): “On the basis of the work of Borsboom (Borsboom, 2006; Borsboom, Mellenbergh, & van Heerden, 2004) and De Houwer (De Houwer, 2006; De Houwer & Moors, 2007; Moors & De Houwer, 2006), we first provide a normative analysis of the concept “implicit measure.””
The Dominance of Associative Theorizing in Implicit Attitude Research: Propositional and Behavioral Alternatives (2011, background): “2 Following De Houwer (2006a), we favor the conceptual distinction in defining a measurement procedure as either direct or indirect on the basis of its procedural properties and the outcome or effect of a procedure as either implicit or explicit on the basis of the properties of the psychological…”
Ten Frequently Asked Questions About Implicit Measures and Their Frequently Supposed, But Not Entirely Correct Answers (2009, background): “First, implicit measures—by definition—do not assess the endorsement of evaluations or beliefs (De Houwer, 2006).”
The Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (Irap) As a Response-Time and Event-Related-Potentials Methodology for Testing Natural Verbal Relations: A Preliminary Study (2008, unknown): “De Houwer (2006) argued recently that a measure is implicit if one or more of the following criteria apply: participants (a) are not aware that the relevant attitude is being measured; (b) do not have conscious access to the attitude; or (c) have no control over the outcome of the measure.”
Automatic and controlled processes and the development of addictive behaviors in adolescents: a review and a model. (2007, background): “The exact role of subjective awareness in these tests awaits further research (De Houwer, 2006), as does its role in addictive behaviors.”
What is meant by inclusion? On the effects of different definitions on attitudes toward inclusive education (2019, background): “Dyson 2014; Haug 2014), their provision of a typology of definitions to enable the systematic evaluation of inclusive practices in different contexts has been welcomed. More specifically, Göransson and Nilholm (2014) synthesised key interpretations of inclusive education, leading to four qualitative”
Do smokers have a negative implicit attitude toward smoking? (2006, background): “Implicit attitudes can be defined as the immediate, automatic affective reactions that stimuli evoke (see De Houwer, 2006; Fazio & Olson, 2003).”
Novel attitudes can be faked on the Implicit Association Test (2007, result): “In line with the Wndings of Gregg et al., De Houwer (2006a) recently found that merely instructing participants that nonwords (Experiment 1) or names of Wctitious social groups (i.e., NiYtes and Luupites; Experiment 2) would be consistently followed by either positive or negative pictures was…”
Unresolved problems with the “I”, the “A”, and the “T”: A logical and psychometric critique of the Implicit Association Test (IAT) (2006, methodology): “, De Houwer, J., Plessner, H., Richter, L., & Gärtner, T. (2002). The sensitivity of the IAT to elaborated and elaborated attitude change.”
Implicit consumer preferences and their influence on product choice (2006, background): “…proposed, for the present purpose, implicit attitudes are described as evaluative responses regarding an attitude object, which, in contrast to explicit attitudes, are not necessarily subject to introspection (Greenwald & Banaji, 1995; see De Houwer, 2006, for a discussion of the term implicit).”
Impulsive versus reflective influences on health behavior: a theoretical framework and empirical review (2008, background): “Typically, such measures assess the degree of compatibility or incompatibility of reactions toward the stimulus of interest and reactions towards positively and negatively valenced stimuli (e.g., De Houwer, 2006).”
The Associative–Propositional Evaluation Model: Theory, Evidence, and Open Questions (2011, methodology): “To fill this theoretical gap, Gawronski, Rydell, Vervliet, and De Houwer (2010) proposed a representational account of generalization versus contextualization effects in evaluative learning that specifies the conditions under which implicit evaluations reflect (a) initially acquired information abou”