Effectiveness of Cooperative Learning (Jigsaw II) Method in Teaching English as a Foreign Language to Engineering Students (Case of Firat University, Turkey).
By M. N. Gomleksiz. 2007
109 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/18959c66c63f653bfcae09c6833d56aa6ae62092
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Mina Homayouni
- Ehsan Namaziandost
- Pegah Rahmani
- Ching-Ying Pan
- Huiping Ning
- Huizhen Wu
- Mehdi Nasri
- G. Hornby
Citations in the corpus
- Enhancing oral proficiency through cooperative learning among intermediate EFL learners: English learning motivation in focus (2019, methodology): “These types of methods according to Gomleksiz (2007) have negatively affected students and produced incompetent users of the English languagewho are unable to improve their speaking skills.”
- The impact of cooperative learning approach on the development of EFL learners’ speaking fluency (2020, background): “It acts as an effective way of teaching for boosting speaking and social interaction among learners (Gomleksiz, 2007).”
- The Cooperative Learning Effects on English Reading Comprehension and Learning Motivation of EFL Freshmen. (2013, background): “14 communication and promotes the socio-linguistic competence of students (Bolukbas, Keskin, & Polat, 2011; Gomleksiz, 2007; Ning, 2011; Tsai, 2004).”
- The impact of cooperative learning on tertiary EFL learners’ motivation (2014, background): “Supportive evidence for this was also revealed in some studies (Gömleksiz 2007; Sachs et al. 2003; Waugh, Bowering, and Chayarathee 2005) which indicated that, in comparison with traditional teaching, CL was more likely to Table 1.”