Social Identity and Leadership Processes in Groups

By M. Hogg, D. van Knippenberg. 2003

362 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/17cef916f7a2a487140f4d717c66289462986f72

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

1. David de Cremer
2. Barbara van Knippenberg
3. M. Hogg
4. D. van Knippenberg
5. Antonio Pierro
6. Lavinia Cicero
7. Dominic Abrams
8. Scott A. Reid

In Social Psychology

1. D. van Knippenberg
2. M. Hogg
3. David de Cremer
4. Barbara van Knippenberg
5. Antonio Pierro
6. Lavinia Cicero
7. Dominic Abrams
8. Scott A. Reid

In Sociology and Political Science

1. D. van Knippenberg
2. M. Hogg
3. David de Cremer
4. Barbara van Knippenberg
5. Antonio Pierro
6. Lavinia Cicero
7. Dominic Abrams
8. Scott A. Reid

Citations in the corpus

• How intragroup dynamics affect behavior in intergroup conflict: The role of group norms, prototypicality, and need to belong (2010, neutral): “…reasons, for example, because of task-relevant expertise (e.g., when purchasing technical equipment), fluency in a language, availability, or negotiation experience (see similar evidence that it is not necessarily the most prototypical member that leads the group; Hogg & Van Knippenberg, 2003).”
• Charismatic leadership and organizational outcomes: The mediating role of employees' work‐group identification (2007, background): “The links between leadership processes, followers' group membership, and consequent identification with the group have recently been analysed (eg, Hogg & Van Knippenberg, 2003 ).”