Striving for personal power as a basis for social power dynamics

By M. Dijke, M. Poppe. 2006

136 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/173b8969e1dfe47df415ab6ffd5c94ae92fcc2a8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. A. Guinote

In Safety Research

1. Lindred L. Greer
2. A. Guinote

In Sociology and Political Science

1. L. Bunderen
2. Siyu Yu
3. Lindred L. Greer
4. A. Guinote
5. Stefan Thau
6. Adam D. Galinsky
7. Marko Pitesa

Citations in the corpus

• The dysfunctions of power in teams: A review and emergent conflict perspective (2017, background): “…decision-making authority, monetary bene fi ts, organizational ranks and promotions, prestige, recognition, control, agency, independence, and well-being (e.g., Adler, Epel, Castellazzo, & Ickovics, 2000; Berger, Rosenholtz, & Zelditch 1980; Davis & Moore 1945; Kipnis 1972; Van Dijke & Poppe, 2006).”
• Behaviour variability and the Situated Focus Theory of Power (2007, background): “Recent findings indicate that power strivings are better explained by strivings to increase personal agency, and decrease dependence from others, rather than by strivings to control others per se (van Dijke & Poppe, 2006).”