Work and rumination.
By M. Cropley, F. Zijlstra. 2011
215 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Health Professions, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/16ca73a1c202dee2f58013b19336c703fbd9fdb4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Health Professions
- Arnold B. Bakker
- Despoina Xanthopoulou
- Wido G M Oerlemans
- Evangelia Demerouti
- Wilmar B. Schaufeli
- James G. Field
- Andrew A. Bennett
- Jürgen Wegge
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Arnold B. Bakker
- Despoina Xanthopoulou
- Wido G M Oerlemans
- Wilmar B. Schaufeli
- Evangelia Demerouti
- James G. Field
- Andrew A. Bennett
- Ute Stephan
Citations in the corpus
- Need for recovery after emotional labor: Differential effects of daily deep and surface acting (2018, background): “Although one could argue that when employees are fed up with work at the end of theworkdaywill try to avoid thinking or talking about work, Cropley and Zijlstra (2011)—based on the experiments on the “white bear” effect (Wegner, Schneider, Carter, & White, 1987)— explained that by trying to avoid…”
- Recovery from work-related effort: A meta-analysis (2018, background): “It has been suggested that individuals who enjoy their work and find their work interesting may engage in problem‐solving pondering (Cropley & Zijlstra, 2011).”
- Having a creative day: understanding entrepreneurs’ daily idea generation through a recovery lens (2018, background): “Mental recovery in the form of problem-solving pondering, i.e., a cognitive state which is emotionally neutral and characterized by repetitive thinking about work-related problems (Cropley and Zijlstra, 2011), enables creative problem exploration (e.g., Amabile and Mueller, 2008).”