The bystander effect and social control behavior: the effect of the presence of others on people's reactions to norm violations

By P. Chekroun, Markus Brauer. 2002

246 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/16aeb56392639d92dd229763a3eeb40d7b02c5b8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Literature and Literary Theory

In Sociology and Political Science

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

Citations in the corpus

The bystander-effect: a meta-analytic review on bystander intervention in dangerous and non-dangerous emergencies. (2011, background): “Chekroun and Brauer (2002) exposed participants to vignettes of antisocial behavior by a focal person (e.g., littering a park with plastic bottles).”
Picking Up the Gauntlet: How Individuals Respond to Status Challenges (2008, background): “Research has shown that a larger range of behaviors are considered appropriate or legitimate for high-status individuals (Chekroun & Brauer, 2002; Guinote, Judd, & Brauer, 2002; Keltner, Gruenfeld, & Anderson, 2003; Overbeck, Tiedens, & Brion, 2006), even when those behaviors violate norms…”
Can employees be emotionally drained by witnessing unpleasant interactions between coworkers? A diary study of induced emotion regulation (2012, background): “On the one hand, the effect may be amplified if the witness is influenced by the emotional response of coworkers, but on the other hand it may be diminished if the witness feels less responsibility for what they observe due to a bystander effect (eg, Chekroun & Brauer, 2002 ).”
Moral emotions as determinants of third-party punishment: Anger, guilt, and the functions of altruistic sanctions (2009, background): “Bystander effects have also been demonstrated for norm-enforcing behavior (Chekroun & Brauer, 2002).”
What is moral courage? Definition, explication, and classification of a complex construct. (2010, unknown): “Social control involves an intervention that curbs impolite or uncivil behavior, that is, a verbal or nonverbal communication by which individuals signal another person that they disapprove of his or her deviant, counternormative behavior (Chekroun & Brauer, 2002).”
Descriptive norms, prescriptive norms, and social control: An intercultural comparison of people's reactions to uncivil behaviors (2009, background): “For example, one study showed that 40% of the individuals who witnessed the behavior expressed their disapproval to a confederate who threw an empty plastic bottle in the bushes of a small neighborhood park (Chekroun & Brauer, 2002).”
The Focusing and Informational Effects of Norms on Pro-Social Behavior (2009, unknown): “…Fehr and Schmidt (1999), Kahneman, Knetsch, and Thaler (1986), Andreoni (1990), Cialdini, Reno, and Kallgren (1990), Sunstein (1996), Kallgren, Reno, and Cialdini (2000), Chekroun and Brauer (2002), Conlin, Lynn, and O’Donoghue (2003), Camerer and Fehr (2004), Bicchieri (2005) and Kreps (1997).”
The Relationship Between Perceived Violation of Social Norms and Social Control: Situational Factors Influencing the Reaction to Deviance (2005, background): “For example, in Situation A (poster 4Some of the data in the situations “litter in park” and “graffiti in elevator” already have been published elsewhere (Chekroun & Brauer, 2002).”
How do we know if it works? Measuring outcomes in bystander-focused abuse prevention on campuses (2014, methodology): “Their measure was based on work by Prochaska and DiClemente (1984) and was designed to capture awareness of the problem of sexual abuse.”
The social dynamics of breaking the rules: antecedents and consequences of norm-violating behavior (2015, background): “com other observers were present (an instance of the famous ‘bystander effect’ [49]), except when the participant’s personal involvement was high [50].”