A systematic review of school-based interventions to prevent bullying.

By R. Vreeman, Aaron E. Carroll. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 2007

815 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Safety Research, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/168bbab237548f0d81c5dc67e24dd4921dfdea44

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

In Safety Research

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Three‐year results of the Friendly Schools whole‐of‐school intervention on children’s bullying behaviour (2011, methodology): “While self report is used in most studies evaluating anti-bullying behavioural interventions (Vreeman & Carroll, 2007) it does not correspond well with peer, parent and teacher reports.”
Bullying victimization in youths and mental health problems: ‘Much ado about nothing’? (2009, background): “Third, interventions aimed at preventing and reducing bullying behaviours in schools have shown limited success (Smith et al. 2003; Bauer et al. 2007 ; Vreeman & Carroll, 2007).”
Direct and Relational Bullying Among Children and Adolescents: Coping and Psychological Adjustment (2009, background): “findings make it possible to draw conclusions for optimizing (secondary) preventive programs for school bullying (for a review see Pepler et al., 2004; Vreeman and Carroll, 2007).”
Addressing school bullying: Insights from theories of group processes (2015, background): “tive, corrective, or a combination) to a student exhibiting negative classroom behaviors, White and Kistner (1992) found that students judged the misbehaving child more harshly when the teacher provided negative, dispositional feedback about their behavior.”
Effectiveness of Programs to Prevent School Bullying (2007, positive): “Based on Vreeman and Carroll (2007), we estimate that about half of all evaluations have an initial sample size of 200 or more, and conversely half have an initial sample size less than this.”
Counteracting bullying in Finland: The KiVa program and its effects on different forms of being bullied (2011, background): “The difficulty of reducing bullying had already been shown by numerous metaanalyses on bullying intervention studies (e.g., Ferguson, San Miguel, Kilburn, & Sanchez, 2007; Smith, Schneider, Smith, & Ananiadou, 2004; Ttofi, Farrington, & Baldry, 2008; Vreeman & Carroll, 2007).”
School-Based Programs to Reduce Bullying and Victimization (2012, background): “summarized effect sizes in 14 whole-school anti-bullying programs, and by Vreeman and Carroll (2007), who reviewed 26 school-based programs.”
Preventing School Bullying: Should Schools Prioritize an Authoritative School Discipline Approach Over Security Measures? (2016, background): “There is some consensus that a comprehensive approach—one that involves the entire school rather than just targeted individuals—tends to result in less bullying (Vreeman & Carroll, 2007).”
A large-scale evaluation of the KiVa antibullying program: grades 4-6. (2011, background): “In addition, Baldry and Farrington (2007) proposed that the inconsistent findings may be associated with variations in assessment methods and evaluation designs (see also Farrington & Ttofi, 2009; Vreeman & Carroll, 2007).”
Observing Bullying at School: The Mental Health Implications of Witness Status (2009, background): “Interventions are needed that include and engage students who are not victims themselves but who are aware of victimization taking place, as these students can play a positive role in enhancing the school environment (Frey et al., 2005; Hawkins et al., 2001; Vreeman & Carroll, 2007).”