Again, and Again, and Again …

By B. Jasny, G. Chin, L. Chong, S. Vignieri. 2011

141 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1579178d29ad1924039ca40bec28974863866959

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Michael A. McDaniel
2. Sven Kepes
3. Gilles E. Gignac
4. George Menexes
5. Timothy C. Bates
6. Stavros D. Veresoglou

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Michael A. McDaniel
2. Sven Kepes
3. Richard Lynn
4. H. Rindermann
5. Gilles E. Gignac
6. Timothy C. Bates
7. George Menexes
8. Stavros D. Veresoglou

In Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

1. Gilles E. Gignac
2. Timothy C. Bates
3. George Menexes
4. Stavros D. Veresoglou

Citations in the corpus

• How Trustworthy Is the Scientific Literature in Industrial and Organizational Psychology? (2013, background): “Replications are considered by many to be the ‘‘scientific gold standard’’ (Jasny et al., 2011, p. 1225) because they are essential for the ability of a scientific field to self-correct, which is one of the hallmarks of science (Merton, 1942, 1973).”
• An open investigation of the reproducibility of cancer biology research (2014, unknown): “Two central features of science are transparency and reproducibility ( Bacon, 1267/1859 ; Jasny et al., 2011 ; Kuhn, 1962 ; Merton, 1942 ; Popper, 1934/1992 ).”