Visual and Auditory Message Framing Effects on Tobacco Smoking1

By Tamera R. Schneider, Peter Salovey, U. Pallonen, N. Mundorf, N. Smith, Wayne T. Steward. 2001

159 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1541388420af18b2713dd80b20cf92f51da2a65d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Literature and Literary Theory

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Effects of message framing, vividness congruency and statistical framing on responses to charity advertising (2010, methodology): “Drawing upon congruency theory (Edell & Staelin 1983; Houston et al. 1987; Unnava & Burnkrant 1991; Heckler & Childers 1992; Kellaris et al. 1993; Schneider et al. 2001), we find that vivid presentation has an additional impact on message framing when used congruently.”
The Effects of Gain Versus Loss Message Framing and Point of Reference on Consumer Responses to Green Advertising (2015, background): “Topics include cancer detection (e.g., Meyerowitz and Chaiken 1987; Schneider et al. 2001a), antismoking (e.g., Schneider et al. 2001b), skin cancer prevention (e.g., Block and Keller 1995; Rothman et al. 1997), HIV detection (Apanovitch, McCarthy, and Salovey 2003), and blood donation (Hupfer…”
The Impact of Regulatory Focus on Adolescents’ Response to Antismoking Advertising Campaigns (2007, result): “Previous research has obtained mixed findings about how the message frame might affect the persuasiveness of antismoking advertisements (Schneider et al. 2001; Wilson, Wallston, and King 1990; Wong and McMurray 2002).”
The Effects of Message Framing and Visual Image on Persuasion (2013, background): “However, none examines the potential for imagery to moderate the effect of framing on persuasion in the manner proposed here (but see Schneider et al., 2001).”
Fear Appeals and Information Security Behaviors: An Empirical Study (2010, background): “Furthermore, these types of fearinducing persuasive messages have been proven to be successful in inciting changes in attitude, behavioral intent, and behavior (Schneider et al. 2001; Sherer and Rogers 1984).”
Effects of fear on risk and control judgements and memory: Implications for health promotion messages (2005, background): “Fearful messages are also thought to be memorable (Hale & Dillard, 1995; Schneider et al., 2001; Sturges & Rogers, 1996).”