DSM-5 internet gaming disorder needs a unified approach to assessment

By Mark D. Griffiths, Daniel L. King, Zsolt Demetrovics. 2014

182 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Education, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/144eaaab89cd05ff4b2e56edf52f41c4bad30b36

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Education

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Assessment of internet gaming disorder in clinical research: Past and present perspectives (2014, background): “Given the recent call for unification in the assessment of IGD from experts in the field (24,72,93,99), two new psychometric tools (100,101) have been developed by the present authors in order to help overcome some of the challenges regarding the assessment of IGD.”
Measuring DSM-5 internet gaming disorder: Development and validation of a short psychometric scale (2015, background): “…agree upon (e.g., IGD) and standardised psychometric tool rooted in the IGD concept, may represent an important step in providing a consensual view of the phenomenon from a scientific standpoint, and help unify different approaches into a singular one amongst researchers (Griffiths et al., 2014).”
Measurement and Conceptualization of Gaming Disorder According to the World Health Organization Framework: the Development of the Gaming Disorder Test (2019, unknown): “Due to the initial recognition of IGD in the DSM-5, the focus of the scholarly debate has shifted from questioning whether IGD merited formal recognition as a mental health disorder to highlighting the need to further understand the core experiences of IGD from a broad biological, psychological, and”
The Association Between Internet Gaming Disorder and Impulsivity: A Systematic Review of Literature (2019, unknown): “In future studies, validated instruments specifically designed to assess IGD should be adopted and tested in different settings to improve cross-cultural reliability (Griffiths et al. 2014).”
An Overview of Problematic Gaming (2015, background): “researchers and clinicians in the problematic gaming field (Griffiths et al., 2014b) and by those who have sought treatment for such disorders and who may now feel more validated and less stigmatized.”