From ‘industrial districts’ to ‘knowledge clusters’: a model of knowledge dissemination and competitive advantage in industrial agglomerations

By S. Pinch, Nick Henry, M. Jenkins, Stephen Tallman. 2003

339 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1420ecc30e9994d2d7dbe3879dc2f91f3c214aac

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Geographies of production: growth regimes in spatial perspective (II) - knowledge creation and growth in clusters (2005, background): “This is done by focussing on the knowledge creation effects of clusters instead of their material flows (Malmberg and Maskell, 2002; Pinch et al., 2003).”
Analytical Differences in the Economics of Geography: The Case of the Multinational Firm (2005, background): “On the other hand, in most of the literature in economic geography and regional science, the focus is on the location of the MNE subsidiary within the industrial cluster, and the multinational firm is treated as a unitary entity interacting with a local system of innovation (Pinch et al, 2003).”
FIRMS GROWTH, SIZE AND INNOVATION AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE ITALIAN MANUFACTURING SECTOR (2008, background): “Such knowledge-based approach is grounded on the idea that the ability to create and transfer knowledge is a crucial component in sustaining competitive advantage through innovation and other value generating activities (Pinch et al , 2003 ; Forsman and Solitander, 2003 ).”
Business model configurations and performance: A qualitative comparative analysis in Formula One racing, 2005–2013 (2015, background): “…such as technological innovation (Jenkins, 2010; Marino et al., 2015), imitation responses (Jenkins, 2014), status interplay between F1 firms and their suppliers (Castellucci and Ertug, 2010), and advantages derived from geographical localization (Pinch et al., 2003; Jenkins and Tallman, 2015).”
Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Industrial Development: Geography and the Creative Field Revisited (2006, background): “The ideational core of any paradigm is invariably composed of what can be identified in the terms proposed by Polanyi (1966) as both tacit and explicit knowledge (Foray and Steinmuller 2003; Gertler 2003; Lissoni 2001; Pinch et al. 2003).”
Location, Control and Innovation in Knowledge-Intensive Industries (2008, background): “However, since the need for modularization and black boxing is considerably lower and firmspecific knowledge tends to be geographically bounded (Pinch et al., 2003; Henderson et al., 2005), the firm retains a wider repository of activities and competencies in advanced market economies.”
The Urban Creative-Food Economy: Producing Food for the Urban Elite or Social Inclusion Opportunity? (2006, background): “This underscores to us the importance of knowledge flows (Bryson et al, 2000; Gertler, 2001; Pinch et al, 2003).”