Capturing momentary, self-report data: A proposal for reporting guidelines
By Arthur A. Stone, Saul Shiffman. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 2002
778 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/136afe9f946a911c70912dca5293eb5b5aa916e4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
- Urte Scholz
- A. Luszczynska
- Rebecca J. Collie
- S. Lippke
- Paul Ginns
- J. Ziegelmann
- Ralf Schwarzer
- Benjamin Schüz
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Rebecca J. Collie
- Paul Ginns
- Brad A Papworth
- Andrew J. Martin
- J. Smith
- Lars-Erik Malmberg
- Rafael A. Calvo
- R. Ilies
Citations in the corpus
- On the assessment and analysis of variables in the health action process approach conducting an investigation (2003, methodology): “Because retrospective assessment strategies often cause biases and distortions, some techniques have been developed to reduce errors in assessment procedures (cf. Stone & Shiffmann, 2002).”
- Diary methods: capturing life as it is lived. (2003, background): “Recently, Stone & Shiffman (2002) proposed a set of guidelines for the reporting of diary studies.”
- Real-time motivation and engagement during a month at school: Every moment of every day for every student matters (2015, background): “In questionnaire studies, responses are subject to retrospection bias (Beal & Weiss, 2003; Clark & Teasdale, 1982; Robinson & Clore, 2002; Stone & Shiffman, 2002) such that individuals' retrospections of their states, experiences, and behaviors are not always reliable depictions of their true…”
- Ambulatory Assessment: New adventures in characterizing dynamic processes (2016, neutral): “Data management is an overlooked and underreported aspect of AA studies (McCabe, Mack, & Fleeson, 2012; Stone & Shiffman, 2002) and researchers new to AA methodology might be surprised at the amount of work awaiting them when they reach this stage of their study.”
- Scientific Contributions of Within-Person Research in Management: Making the Juice Worth the Squeeze (2018, background): “Researchers seeking to elucidate within-person phenomena are faced with a number of decisions pertaining to data gathering and study implementation (Stone & Shiffman, 2002).”
- Measuring subjective well-being for public policy (2011, background): “EMA is based on reports of wellbeing at specific (often randomly chosen) points in time and also includes other approaches, such as the recording of events, and explicitly includes self-reports of one's own behaviours and physiological measures (Stone and Shiffman, 2002 ).”
- Are You Happy While You Work (2017, neutral): “In addition, in some traditional ESM studies, the majority of responses were found to have been completed long before or long after the signalling time, with the reported time and date having been fabricated to conceal this (Stone and Shiffman, 2002).”