Structural changes in logistics: how will port authorities face the challenge?

By Theo E. Notteboom *, W. Winkelmans. 2001

564 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Building and Construction, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1146b243e22055b995ba4eda82159aeb3701d194

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Building and Construction

In Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

Citations in the corpus

Port privatization, efficiency and competitiveness: Some empirical evidence from container ports (terminals) (2005, background): “Ports face the constant risk of losing important clients, not because of deficiencies in port infrastructure or terminal operations, but because the client has rearranged its service networks or has engaged in new partnerships with other carriers (Notteboom and Winkelmans, 2001).”
Rethinking the Port (2006, background): “Although Notteboom and Winkelmans (2001a) suggest that a proper understanding of today's port features should recognize that `̀ the scale economies approach has to be complemented, if not partly replaced, by an economies of scope approach'' (page 87), they concede that ``larger ships, larger…”
Operations research at container terminals: a literature update (2007, background): “…for aspects of competition and efficiency see, e.g., Ashar (2006); Cullinane et al. (2005, 2006a); Cullinane and Wang (2006); Notteboom (2006a,b); Notteboom and Winkelmans (2001); Notteboom (2004); Notteboom and Rodrigue (2005); Polo and Díaz (2006); Tongzon and Heng (2005); Wang and Cullinane…”
Hinterland transportation in Europe: Combined transport versus road transport (2010, background): “The issue of traffic flow is thus decisive not only for port managers but also for the public authorities as traffic flow is directly responsible for a share of a port’s competitiveness (Notteboom and Winkelmans, 2001).”
Port regionalization: towards a new phase in port development (2005, unknown): “Notteboom, T. and Winkelmans, W., 2001, Structural changes in logistics: how do port authorities face the challenge?”
Concentration and the formation of multi-port gateway regions in the European container port system: an update (2010, background): “Port authorities around Europe have gained a more autonomous status via commercialization, corporatization and privatization processes (Notteboom and Winkelmans, 2001b).”
The Importance of Maritime Transport for Economic Growth in the European Union: A Panel Data Analysis (2021, background): “The benefits of seaports analysed in the literature include [18] reducing transport costs [19,20], increasing private investment, encouraging trade [21], fostering employment [22,23], improving logistics [24], and other port-related activities [23,25].”
Container Shipping And Ports: An Overview (2004, background): “Notteboom and Winkelmans (2001b) and Heaver et al (2000) primarily discussed the changing role of port authorities in the new logistic-restructured environment, while Martin and Thomas (2001) addressed structural changes in the container terminal community.”
Transformation of port terminal operations: from the local to the global (2005, background): “This state of affairs has already received much academic attention (Evangelista et al., 2001; Heaver et al., 2001; Notteboom and Winkelmans, 2001).”
Why are maritime ports (still) urban, and why should policy-makers care? (2012, background): “disciplined by, the logics of economic globalization [5, 6].”
Understanding Port Choice Behavior—A Network Perspective (2011, background): “Given these circumstances, Slack (1993), Notteboom and Winkelmans (2001) and many others have advocated that ports must understand and adapt themselves to meet the frequently changing demands of their customers.”