Internal governance mechanisms and firm performance in China

By H. Hu, O. Tam, M. Tan. 2009

244 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/105218b7aa626c6617e823539c5577d5eaa48196

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. Mike W. Peng
2. Yuan Li
3. En Xie
4. Zhongfeng Su
5. Daniel M. Shapiro
6. Yuan Lu
7. K. Meyer
8. S. Globerman

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Mike W. Peng
2. Yuan Li
3. En Xie
4. Zhongfeng Su
5. Daniel M. Shapiro
6. Yuan Lu
7. A. Solarino
8. S. Globerman

Citations in the corpus

• Corporate Social Responsibility in China: A Corporate Governance Approach (2014, result): “…Governance and Corporate Social Performance From the literature of corporate governance studies in China, we understand that some arrangements are effective in monitoring top management behaviors, while some others may not have conclusive results (Firth et al. 2007; Hu et al. 2010; Peng 2004).”
• Corporate governance and Asian companies (2011, background): “…corporate governance, such as executive compensation (Sun, Zhao, & Yang, 2010), CEO dismissals (Li & Lu, 2011; Pi & Lowe, 2011), supervisory boards (Hu et al., 2010), private benefits of control (Luo, Wan, & Cai, 2011), business groups (Ramaswamy, Li, & Petitt, 2011), and political interference…”
• Board of Directors, Audit Committee Characteristics and the Performance of Saudi Arabia Listed Companies (2012, result): “The investigation showed that the audit committee failed to effectively oversee the mangers duties (Weiss, 2005).”
• Ownership of Corporations (2016, background): “Finally, blockholders are negatively associated with board independence in Asia (Chizema & Kim, 2010; Hu et al., 2010) but have a positive relationship in the U.S. (Schnatterly & Johnson, 2014).”
• CEO duality, organizational slack, and firm performance in China (2010, background): “The moderating effect of CEO duality The influence of organizational slack on firm performance is also determined by how the firm uses its slack (Hu et al., 2009).”
• Corporate governance and dividend pay-out policy in UK listed SMEs: The effects of corporate board characteristics (2017, unknown): “…although a number of past studies suggest that board meetings impacts significantly on performance (Chen & Chen, 2012; Hao, Hu, Liu and Yao, 2014; Hu et al., 2010; Karamanou & Vafeas, 2005; Ntim & Osei, 2011), there seems to be a lack of studies examining the effect of board meetings on dividend…”