Mapping the Developing Landscape of Mixed Methods Research

359 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Critical Appraisal of Mixed Methods Studies (2013, methodology): “So, judging based on the frame of Creswell (2010), these 4 CAFs are the most versatile of the 13 retrieved frameworks.”
Triangulation, Respondent Validation, and Democratic Participation in Mixed Methods Research (2012, background): “…can bring to mixed methods designs, the importance of conceiving of research approaches as a continuum rather than a binary categorisation, and indeed the developing dialogue around valuing diversity of approach and primacy of the research question (Christ, 2010; Creswell, 2010; Niglas, 2010).”