Achievement Gaps and Correlates of Early Mathematics Achievement: Evidence from the ECLS K-First Grade Sample

By Madhabi Chatterji. 2005

58 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Resumen en: In light of the NCLB Act of 2001, this study estimated mathematics achievement gaps in different subgroups of kindergartners and first graders, and ident...

Subfields: Education, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0f07c76c181e19c1c831fd29495ec34198d7de4f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. S. Sonnenschein
2. C. Galindo
3. Jaime Puccioni
4. P. Banerjee
5. Sean F. Reardon
6. Gary E. Bingham

In Statistics and Probability

1. Jaime Puccioni
2. C. Galindo
3. S. Sonnenschein
4. P. Banerjee

Citations in the corpus

• A systematic review of factors linked to poor academic performance of disadvantaged students in science and maths in schools (2016, background): “Schools giving more instructional time to reading and math have had a positive effect on high poverty students’ scores (Chatterji, 2005).”
• Decreasing the SES math achievement gap: Initial math proficiency and home learning environments (2015, background): “For example, reading at home and parents’ expectations for their children’s future educational achievement are associated with children’s math achievement (Byrnes & Wasik, 2009; Chatterji, 2005; Davis-Kean, 2005; Sonnenschein & Galindo, 2015; Yan & Lin, 2005).”
• Parents’ Conceptions of School Readiness, Transition Practices, and Children's Academic Achievement Trajectories (2015, result): “Recent studies have shown that girls have higher average reading scores in comparison with boys; in contrast boys have higher average mathematics scores in comparison with girls (Chatterji, 2005, 2006; Ready, LoGerfo, Burkham, & Lee, 2005).”
• Sustained Acceleration of Achievement in Reading Comprehension: The New Zealand Experience. (2009, background): “This need is specifically identified in discussions about alternatives to experimental randomized designs (Borko, 2004; Chatterji, 2005; Raudenbush, 2005).”