Privacy attitudes and privacy behaviour: A review of current research on the privacy paradox phenomenon

By Spyros Kokolakis. Computers & security, 2017

1,152 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Information Systems and Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e041cf62681944a874a712ba216441cf117f4139

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

In Information Systems and Management

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Citizens Versus the Internet: Confronting Digital Challenges With Cognitive Tools (2019, background): “Another paradox in people’s privacy behavior online is the privacy paradox: On one hand, people claim to care a great deal about their online privacy, but on the other, they appear to show little concern for it in their actual behavior (e.g., Acquisti et al., 2015; Norberg et al., 2007; for reviews”
The corporate cultivation of digital resignation (2019, background): “…of large segments of the public in response to the Facebook revelations and similar incidents as representing a “privacy paradox”— that is the idea that although people say they care about information privacy, they often behave in ways that contradict those claims (Barnes, 2006; Kokolakis, 2017).”
Explicating the privacy paradox: A qualitative inquiry of online shopping consumers (2020, methodology): “Prior research indicates that despite online consumers’ concerns and worries over privacy, they at times readily divulge their personal information, accept being tracked and profiled, and fail to take adequate protective measures (Baruh et al., 2017; Berendt et al., 2005; Kokolakis, 2017; Norberg et”
Seven HCI Grand Challenges (2019, background): “Kokolakis (2017) identifies a number of potential factors for this paradox, including that the use of OSNs has become a habit and is integrated into daily life, that the perceived benefits of participation outweigh observed risks, that individuals do not make information-sharing decisions as…”
Six Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence Grand Challenges (2023, neutral): “…paradox ” provides that while internet users purport to be “ highly concerned about their privacy and the collection and use of their personal information, ” they act in ways that show minimal care to protect it and reveal their information for disproportionately low reward (Kokolakis, 2017).”
The privacy paradox - Investigating discrepancies between expressed privacy concerns and actual online behavior - A systematic literature review (2017, background): “We did however, find a review of current research on the privacy paradox phenomenon (Kokolakis, 2017).”
Alexa, she's not human but… Unveiling the drivers of consumers' trust in voice‐based artificial intelligence (2021, background): “…generally divided into three main types, being (1) territorial privacy concerning the physical surrounding space; (2) privacy of a person against undue interference; and (3) information privacy of control of the gathering, storage, processing, and dissemination of personal data (Kokolakis, 2017).”
Secrets and Likes: The Drive for Privacy and the Difficulty of Achieving It in the Digital Age (2020, background): “the factors affecting privacy choice, and the contexts in which the dichotomy can emerge (see discussions of multiple explanations in Acquisti, Brandimarte, & Loewenstein, 2015; Kokolakis, 2017; Solove, 2021).”