Explaining frequency of verb morphology in early L2 speech

By R. Hawkins, Gabriela Casillas. 2008

103 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0c9d925e9ac30671ea9f948d8a00b27193c34dcf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Plural-marking in L2 Korean: A feature-based approach (2013, methodology): “…those that are derivationally most complex, that is embedded most deeply in the feature hierarchy shown in Figure 1, will be acquired latest (for similar suggestions, see e.g. Harley and Ritter, 2002: 498; Hawkins and Casillas, 2008; Lardiere, 2000: 122–124, 2009: 215; McCarthy, 2008, 2012).”
Gender and number agreement in the oral production of Arabic Heritage speakers* (2012, background): “A group of researchers proposes that L2 learners will permanently fail to acquire parameterized properties not instantiated in L1 (e.g., Hawkins & Casillas, 2008; Hawkins & Chan, 1997; Hawkins & Hattori, 2006; Tsimpli, 2003), whereas another group attributes morphological variability to non-access…”
Learning (not) to predict: Grammatical gender processing in second language acquisition (2016, background): “…behavioural or neurophysiological responses to gender agreement violations does not necessarily point to lack of or impairment in morphosyntactic representations (e.g. Hawkins and Casillas, 2008; Hawkins and Chan, 1997) or morphosyntactic processing routines (e.g. Jiang, 2007; Ullman, 2005).”
Morphological Structure in Native and Nonnative Language Processing (2010, background): “…have argued that morphosyntactic features, including those relevant for agreement and case marking, are only accessible to adult L2 learners if they are instantiated in their L1, but not if they are not present in their L1 (e.g., Hawkins & Casillas, 2008; Tsimpli & Dimitrakopoulou, 2007).”
Grammatical gender in adult L2 acquisition: Relations between lexical and syntactic variability (2013, background): “One set of approaches appeals to age-related grammatical impairments arguing that L2 grammars do not encode abstract syntactic gender features necessary for computing agreement relations unless these features are instantiated in the L1 (Hawkins, 2009; Hawkins and Casillas, 2008).”
A systematic review of transfer studies in third language acquisition (2018, background): “…(e.g., Abrahamsson and Hyltenstam, 2009; Bylund, Abrahamsson, and Hyltenstam, 2012; Clahsen and Felser, 2006; DeKeyser, 2000; Granena and Long, 2013; Hawkins and Casillas, 2008; Hawkins and Chan, 1997; Johnson and Newport, 1989; Long, 2005; Sorace, 2011; Tsimpli and Dimitrakopoulou, 2007).”