Strategizing in Industrial Networks

By Lars-Erik Gadde, Lars Huemer, H. Håkansson. 2003

558 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0a24a444bd81cf04d5460a2c5baad3b3e538e83e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. A. Inemek
2. R. Brennan
3. Suvi Nenonen
4. P. Matthyssens
5. Kaj Storbacka

In Strategy and Management

1. Kaj Storbacka
2. Suvi Nenonen
3. A. Inemek
4. P. Matthyssens

Citations in the corpus

• Markets as configurations (2011, background): “Instead it should be viewed as the firm’s effort to influence the market configuration (Johanson and Mattsson, 1992; Gadde et al., 2003).”
• Strategic Thinking and the IMP Approach: a Comparative Analysis (2007, methodology): “Industrial network scholars include the influence of external actors in the strategy process and explicitly depict it as interactive: This is for instance the type of contribution addressed by Håkansson and Ford (2002) or by the special issue of IMM on strategizing (Gadde et al., 2003).”
• The impact of buyer–supplier relationships on supplier innovativeness: An empirical study in cross-border supply networks (2013, methodology): “Regarding themoderating effect of tier position, we turn to industrial network theory (Gadde et al., 2003; Möller & Rajala, 2007) and power-dependence perspective (Gulati & Sytch, 2007; Heide & John, 1988; Kumar et al.”