Team innovation and team effectiveness: The importance of minority dissent and reflexivity

297 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Antecedents and consequences of reflexivity in new product idea screening (2011, background): “Finally, De Dreu (2002) does not find significant direct effects, but emphasizes a positive moderating effect of reflexivity on the relationships between minority dissent (‘‘a minority in a team publicly opposing the beliefs, ideas, procedures, and policies’’ p. 285) and team innovativeness and…”
Team Reflexivity and Innovation (2015, background): “Team reflexivity has been shown to be important for team effectiveness and performance, but research investigating the boundary conditions of team reflexivity has been scarce (for exceptions, see De Dreu, 2002, 2007).”
Team Reflexivity as an Antidote to Team Information-Processing Failures (2014, background): “The mixed-motive structure of many group tasks is extensively discussed in a review of De Dreu and his colleagues (2008), which presents a motivated information processing in groups (MIP-G) model.”