Student evaluations of teaching: effects of the Big Five personality traits, grades and the validity hypothesis

144 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Teachers—The Vital Resource (2013, background): “…& Greenberg, 2009) and reflect the skills and tools through which a teacher is able to manage demands, deal with stressful events, and maximize his or her personal strengths including personality and temperament factors (e.g., Henson & Chambers, 2003; Patrick, 2011; Schyns & Collani, 2002).”
The effects of lecturer commitment on student perceptions of teaching quality and student satisfaction in Chinese higher education (2015, unknown): “However, Patrick (2011) found a link between lecturer conscientiousness and students’ evaluations of teaching, and Ahmad, Ather, and Hussain (2014) argue that affective commitment can act as a mediator in the relationship between conscientiousness and job performance.”
On the Validity of Student Evaluation of Teaching (2013, methodology): “Examples include teacher personality as measured by the Big Five personality traits (Clayson & Sheffet, 2006; Patrick, 2011), physical attractiveness (Campbell et al.”