Leadership and innovation: relations between leadership, individual characteristics and the functioning of R&D teams

By J. Stoker, J. C. Looise, Olaf A. M. Fisscher, R. Jong. 2001

159 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/08e5ca27c4ec63541ea8dd3f159409c5e0bfd93f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. T. Judge
2. Daniel Jiménez-Jiménez
3. Raquel Sanz-Valle
4. Jens Rowold

In Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality

1. T. Judge

In Strategy and Management

1. Jens Rowold
2. J. Bono
3. Emily E. Duehr
4. Kathrin Heinitz
5. T. Judge
6. Ronald F. Piccolo
7. Daniel Jiménez-Jiménez
8. Raquel Sanz-Valle

Citations in the corpus

• The relative impact of complementary leader behaviors: Which matter most? (2012, result): “These results are consistent with studies that have measured both leadershipmodels (e.g., Stoker et al., 2001) and the results of the small meta-analysis reported in Study 1.”
• Could HRM support organizational innovation? (2008, background): “Furthermore, these teams have to foster the autonomy (Clark and Wheelwright 1993 ; Stoker, Looise, Fisscher and De Jong 2001 ) and the interdisciplinary of their members (e.”
• Organizing innovation: Complementarities between cross-functional teams (2009, unknown): “(Lee and Chen (2007; 608) 6 Team performance may also depend, however, on leadership (e.g. Stoker et al, 2001), external threat or support (West, 2002) or teamwork quality (Hoegl and Gemuenden, 2001). that the potential impact on innovation of cross-functional teams may be lost if managers try to…”