Evaluating Multilevel Models in Cross-Cultural Research

By Mike W.-L. Cheung, K. Leung, K. Au. 2006

136 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/08851ff936e4d3084627985db04e6a8e0074c74c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Mike W.-L. Cheung
2. Fanny M. Cheung
3. M. Bond
4. Wai-Sum Chan
5. K. Leung
6. Louis Tay
7. Jeroen K. Vermunt
8. Sang Eun Woo

In Social Psychology

1. M. Bond
2. Eldad Davidov
3. Jan Cieciuch
4. Fanny M. Cheung
5. P. Schmidt
6. K. Leung
7. Shalom H. Schwartz
8. Frederick T. L. Leong

In Sociology and Political Science

1. M. Bond
2. Eldad Davidov
3. Fanny M. Cheung
4. Jan Cieciuch
5. P. Schmidt
6. K. Leung
7. Shalom H. Schwartz
8. Mike W.-L. Cheung

Citations in the corpus

• A Two-Stage Approach to Synthesizing Covariance Matrices in Meta-Analytic Structural Equation Modeling (2009, methodology): “This assumption can be justified in cross-cultural research in which there are usually no missing variables (e.g., M. W. L. Cheung et al., 2006).”
• A critical analysis of cross-cultural research and testing practices: Implications for improved education and training in psychology (2009, methodology): “This caveat notwithstanding, a review of the literature reveals that, except for a few recent studies (e.g., M. W.-L. Cheung & Au, 2005; M. W.-L. Cheung et al., 2006; van de Vijver & Watkins, 2006), virtually all cross-cultural research has been conducted as single-level analyses, mostly at the…”
• A Conceptual and Methodological Framework for Psychometric Isomorphism (2014, methodology): “Interestingly, the issue of psychometric isomorphism has gained considerable interest in other research areas such as culture and values (e.g., M. W.-L. Cheung, Leung, & Au, 2006; Fontaine & Fischer, 2011; van de Vijver & Leung, 2001; van de Vijver & Watkins, 2006), national personality (e.g., McCra”
• The Comparability of Measurements of Attitudes toward Immigration in the European Social Survey Exact versus Approximate Measurement Equivalence (2015, methodology): “Measurement equivalence is a necessary condition for applying multilevel models for cross-national data–a technique that has been frequently used in comparative antiimmigration research that utilizes survey data for the analysis (Cheung, Leung, and Au 2006).”
• Developing and Evaluating the Social Axioms Survey in Eleven Countries (2012, methodology): “Cheung et al. (2006) argued that SRMR and RMSEA are appropriate for evaluating model fit when sample size is large and unique variance is small, as in our case.”