Who Chooses Military Service? Correlates of Propensity and Enlistment in the U.S. Armed Forces

By J. Bachman, D. Segal, Peter Freedman-Doan, P. O'Malley. 2000

171 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Gender Studies

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/081a82d8ae6bc443f0130695cb005727b94ad4c3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Filip Lievens
2. Greet van Hoye

In Gender Studies

1. Greet van Hoye
2. Filip Lievens
3. B. Schreurs
4. Wei-Chi Tsai
5. Irene Wen-fen Yang
6. A. Saks

Citations in the corpus

• Employer branding in the Belgian Army: The importance of instrumental and symbolic beliefs for potential applicants, actual applicants, and military employees (2007, background): “This hypothesis is based on the importance of symbolic meanings in the development and management of organizational identification ( Ashforth & Mael, 1989 ).”
• Examining the relationship between employer knowledge dimensions and organizational attractiveness: An application in a military context (2005, methodology): “However, prior research on military propensity and enlistment of high school seniors has focused on demographic, biographic, educational, and family background factors and attitudes about military service (Bachman et al., 2000; Martin, 1995), ignoring the specific determinants of high school seniors”