The Extrinsic Affective Simon Task.

By J. de Houwer. 2003

324 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/080c8530cb76fefc0aba8c01d0d8de95b602d134

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Implicit measures: A normative analysis and review. (2009, background): “That is, the psychological attributes of the individual are inferred from the speed or accuracy with which the individual responds to certain stimuli in certain tasks (e.g., De Houwer, 2003a; Nosek & Banaji, 2001; see De Houwer, 2003b, for a structural analysis and review).”
Prepared to eat: How immediate affective and motivational responses to food cues are influenced by food deprivation. (2007, methodology): “De Houwer (2003) showed that the EAST can be used to simultaneously and independently assess the immediate valences of different”
Unresolved problems with the “I”, the “A”, and the “T”: A logical and psychometric critique of the Implicit Association Test (IAT) (2006, unknown): “Hence, the IAT constitutes an indirect measurement procedure of associations, which therefore has to rest on a testable model that constitutes the basis of indirect measurement (De Houwer, 2003a, 2006).”
Third wave positive psychology: broadening towards complexity (2020, methodology): “…the most well-known are the implicit association test (Greenwald et al., 1998), the evaluative priming task (Fazio et al., 1995), the extrinsic affective Simon task (De Houwer, 2003), the go/no-go association task (Nosek & Banaji, 2001), and the affect misattribution procedure (Payne et al., 2005).”
The Implicit Association Test at Age 7: A Methodological and Conceptual Review (2007, methodology): “As an added benefit, alternating trials maximizes task switches, which appear to be important contributors to IAT effects (Klauer & Mierke, 2005).”
Decoding the implicit association test: Implications for criterion prediction (2006, background): “A number of other single-target implicit attitude measures have been developed recently ( De Houwer, 2003; Fazio, Jackson, Dunton, & Williams, 1995; Karpinski & Steinman, in press; Nosek & Banaji, 2001; Schnabel et al., 2005).”
Implicit measures: similarities and differences (2010, background): “the extrinsic affective Simon (EAST) effect ( De Houwer, 2003a ), the stimulus response”
Understanding and Using the Implicit Association Test: II. Method Variables and Construct Validity (2005, methodology): “Researchers interested in assessing associations with a single target concept should use a method designed for that purpose (e.g., De Houwer, 2003; Nosek & Banaji, 2001).”
Reliability and validity of the Single‐Target IAT (ST‐IAT): assessing automatic affect towards multiple attitude objects (2008, methodology): “…developed as non-relative measures are the Go/No-Go Association Task (GNAT; Nosek & Banaji, 2001), the Extrinsic Affective Simon Task (EAST; De Houwer, 2003), the newly developed identification-EAST (ID-EAST; De Houwer & De Bruycker, 2007a) and IATs using neutral, <blank>, non-words, a…”
Danger stereotypes predict racially biased attentional allocation (2008, methodology): “Devine (1989) subliminally primed some participants with traits that were stereotypic of Blacks but unrelated to the concept of violence.”