Reliability and validity of the Single‐Target IAT (ST‐IAT): assessing automatic affect towards multiple attitude objects

By M. Bluemke, Malte Friese. 2008

311 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/74d1189cf76152ed1a62e086f0e258a49e0681e7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Malte Friese
2. Wilhelm Hofmann
3. Manfred J. Schmitt
4. Alexander Todorov
5. Ron Dotsch
6. J. Jong
7. Loek Brinkman
8. Jamin Halberstadt

In Social Psychology

1. Malte Friese
2. Manfred J. Schmitt
3. Wilhelm Hofmann
4. M. Bluemke
5. Jamin Halberstadt
6. J. Jong
7. Ron Dotsch
8. Alexander Todorov

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Malte Friese
2. Wilhelm Hofmann
3. Manfred J. Schmitt
4. Ron Dotsch
5. M. Bluemke
6. Alexander Todorov
7. Jamin Halberstadt
8. J. Jong

Citations in the corpus

• Foxhole atheism, revisited: The effects of mortality salience on explicit and implicit religious belief (2012, methodology): “Part 2 then consisted of a computer-based STIAT, an adaptation of the IAT (Greenwald et al., 1998; see Bluemke & Friese, 2008 for a psychometric evaluation of ST-IAT).”
• What are the Biases in My Word Embedding? (2018, background): “In studies of human biases, the combinatorial explosion in groups can be avoided by teasing apart Single-Category IATs which assess associations one group at a time (e.g. Karpinski and Steinman, 2006; Penke, Eichstaedt, and Asendorpf, 2006; Bluemke and Friese, 2008).”
• How Advergame Content Influences Explicit and Implicit Brand Attitudes: When Violence Spills Over (2013, result): “This form of the SC-IAT has proven to be reliable, does not significantly differ in the results from the traditional IAT (Bluemke and Friese 2008; Karpinski and Steinman 2006), and can be used to assess implicit attitudes toward a single brand.”
• Visualising mental representations: A primer on noise-based reverse correlation in social psychology (2017, methodology): “Prejudice was measured with a single-target Implicit Association Task (STIAT; Bluemke & Friese, 2008), where participants categorise in parallel words with positive and negative connotations (on valence) and Moroccan names, using the same response options.”
• When and why do implicit measures predict behaviour? Empirical evidence for the moderating role of opportunity, motivation, and process reliance (2008, background): “More research is needed to find out if and how these changes in mean effects translate into altered stability (Gschwendner, Hofmann, & Schmitt, 2008a) and predictive validity (Bluemke & Friese, 2008).”