New Firm Formation: A Dynamic Capability Perspective

By Scott L. Newbert. 2005

280 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/07850d34b517fa6468da8f8f5818572b26735881

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management of Technology and Innovation

Citations in the corpus

Processes, antecedents and outcomes of dynamic capabilities (2014, unknown): “Most of the studies conceptualising DCs as specific processes focus on product or technology development and transfer (Cetindamar, Phaal, & Probert, 2009; Griffith, Kiessling, & Dabic, 2005; Helfat, 1997; Lawson & Samson, 2001; Mathiassen & Vainio, 2007; Petroni, 1998; Tripsas, 1997), although some ”
The Impact of Knowledge Resources on New Venture Performance (2009, background): “Though intuitively appealing, previous research on this question has been equivocal at best (Newbert 2005).”
Exploring the role of dynamic capabilities in firm performance under the resource-based view framework (2014, background): “Newbert (2007a) also suggests that value and rare resources are related to competitive advantage and that competitive advantage is related to performance. Furthermore, Terziovski (2010) uses RBV analysis to demonstrate that the innovation strategy of small andmedium enterprises resembles that of lar”
Nascent Entrepreneurs and Venture Emergence: Opportunity Confidence, Human Capital, and Early Planning (2010, background): “…captured by the accumulation of various venturing activities (Davidsson and Honig, 2003; Samuelsson and Davidsson, 2009), the achievement of first sale (Newbert, 2005) or the establishment of operating business (Lichtenstein et al., 2007; Parker and Belghitar, 2006; Rotefoss and Kolvereid, 2005).”
Robustness of the Theory of Planned Behavior in Predicting Entrepreneurial Intentions and Actions (2015, background): “Also complex higher-level goals such as starting a new venture (Newbert, 2005) require individual actions to be completed if they are to be achieved, so the specificity requirement can be fulfilled by assessing intentions as well as behavior on the level of actions rather than the achievement of…”
The impact of education, experience and inner circle advisors on SME performance: insights from a study of public development centers (2012, unknown): “quickly (Newbert 2005).”
The Behavioral Impact of Entrepreneur Identity Aspiration and Prior Entrepreneurial Experience (2011, background): “, 1996), not all gestational activities appear to be critical to all types of start-ups (Liao & Welsch; Newbert, 2005).”
*Entrepreneurship and Dynamic Capabilities: A Review, Model and Research Agenda (2006, background): “More broadly, prior research suggests that dynamic capabilities are also important for the creation and evolution of new ventures (Newbert, 2005) and successful entry and survival, especially in international markets (Sapienza et al.”
Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: how firm age and size affect the ‘capability enhancement–SME performance’ relationship (2012, background): “And the sample represented firms from across the major economic sectors in North America (Newbert 2005).”
The Impact of Social Capital on the Start-ups’ Performance Growth (2010, background): “…is the competence and vision possessed by the entrepreneur, who should be able to combine highly mobile knowledge resources with the capability of developing weak and JOURNAL OF SMALL BUSINESS MANAGEMENT220 distant ties in order to discover resources and opportunities during growth (Newbert 2005).”