Epistemic frames for epistemic games

By David Williamson Shaffer. Comput. Educ., 2006

473 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Computer Science Applications, Developmental and Educational Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/077f34364667aaba3dabb7e1f7b99c1d4bf70d93

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

1. Charles K. Kinzer
2. Leonard A. Annetta

In Computer Science Applications

1. Jan L. Plass
2. Charles K. Kinzer
3. Leonard A. Annetta
4. Bruce D. Homer

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Jan L. Plass
2. Bruce D. Homer
3. Charles K. Kinzer
4. Leonard A. Annetta
5. John Sweller

Citations in the corpus

• The “I's” Have It: A Framework for Serious Educational Game Design (2010, background): “Researchers have looked at the implications of commercial games on learning, attitudes, and efficacy, the three areas most reported (Durkin, 2010; Ferguson, 2007; Gee, 2008; Kato, 2010; Shaffer, 2006; Spence & Feng, 2010; Squire, 2008; Steinkuehler & Williams, 2006).”
• Foundations of Game-Based Learning (2015, background): “…perspective (Blumberg, 2011; Fletcher & Tobias, 2005; Mayer, 2005; Shute, Ventura, & Ke, 2014; Spence & Feng, 2009) and a sociocultural perspective (De Freitas, Rebolledo-Mendez, Liarokapis, Magoulas, & Poulovassilis, 2010; Shaffer, 2006; Squire, 2008, 2011; Steinkuehler, Squire, & Barab, 2012).”